| Literature DB >> 18955320 |
Vishnu Kumar1, Mohammad Mubin Khan, Ashok Kumar Khanna, Ranjana Singh, Sushma Singh, Ramesh Chander, Farzana Mahdi, Abbas Ali Mahdi, Jitendra Kumar Saxena, Raj Kumar Singh.
Abstract
The lipid lowering activity of Anthocephalus indicus (family Rubiaceae; Hindi name Kadamba) root extract has been studied in triton WR-1339 induced hyperlipidemia in rats. In this model, feeding with root extract (500 mg kg(-1) b.w.) lowered plasma lipids and reactivated post-heparin lipolytic activity in hyperlipidemic rats. Furthermore, the root extract (50-500 μM) inhibited the generation of superoxide anions and hydroxyl radicals, in both enzymic and non-enzymic systems, in vitro. The results of the present study demonstrated both lipid lowering and antioxidant activities in root extract of A. indicus, which could help prevention of hyperlipidemia and related diseases.Entities:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18955320 PMCID: PMC2887325 DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nen001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Ingredient and nutrient composition of the control basal diet fed to rats
| Ingredients | Amount (g kg−1) |
|---|---|
| Casein | 21 |
| Corn starch | 440 |
| Sucrose | 100 |
| Maltose dextrin | 100 |
| Cellulose | 50 |
| Soybean oil | 50 |
| Vitamins mix | 10 |
| Mineral | 35 |
Other ingredients include choline bitartarate (2 g kg−1) and t-butyl hydroquinone (0.008 g kg−1). Proximate analysis 21% crude protein, 5% crude fat, 4% crude fiber, 8% ash.
Figure 1.Values are mean ± SD of six rats aP < 0.001, bP < 0.01. Hyperlipidemic (control Group 2) was compared with control (Group 1). Hyperlipidemic + A. indicus treated (Group 3) and hyperlipidemic + gemfibrozil (Group 4) was compared with hyperlipidemic control (Group 2).
Figure 2.Values are mean ± SD of six rats aP < 0.001, bP < 0.01. Hyperlipidemic (control Group 2) was compared with control (Group 1). Hyperlipidemic + A. indicus treated (Group 3) and hyperlipidemic + gemfibrozil (Group 4) was compared with hyperlipidemic control (Group 2).
Figure 3.Values are mean ± SD of six rats aP < 0.001, bP < 0.01. Hyperlipidemic control (Group 2) was compared with control (Group 1). Hyperlipidemic + A. indicus treated (Group 3) and hyperlipidemic + gemfibrozil (Group 4) was compared with hyperlipidemic control (Group 2).
Figure 4.Values are mean ± SD of four separate observations. aP < 0.001, bP < 0.001, cP < 0.05, NS = non significant. The systems added with A. indicus were compared with those without adding A. indicus.
Figure 5.Values are mean ± SD of four separate observations. aP < 0.001, bP < 0.001, cP < 0.05, NS = non significant. The systems added with A. indicus were compared with those without adding A. indicus.