Literature DB >> 18955038

Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.

Xun He1, Glyn Humphreys, Silu Fan, Lin Chen, Shihui Han.   

Abstract

Do spatial attention and object attention modulate visual processing in similar ways? Previously we have found a dissociation between these two forms of attention on ERP measures of sensory processing under conditions of peripheral cueing, with spatial attention effects associated with changes over anterior scalp regions and object attention effects associated with changes over posterior regions (He, X., Fan, S., Zhou, K., Chen, L., 2004. Cue validity and object-based attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1085-1097). However, under conditions of central cueing recent data suggest that spatial and object attention have similar effects over posterior cortical areas (e.g., Martínez, A., Teder-Sälejärvi, W., Hillyard, S.A., 2007. Spatial attention facilitates selection of illusory objects: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Res. 1139, 143-152). In the present study we present further evidence for dissociation between spatial and object-based attention under conditions in which spatial attention effects were enhanced by increasing the cue validity and the task load. The data replicated our previous results, with the effects of spatial attention found in an enhanced anterior N1, while the effects of object-based attention emerged in an enhanced posterior N1. Analyses of attention effect maps and current source density maps confirmed the distinct scalp distributions. These results support the proposal that, under peripheral cueing, spatial attention and object attention are associated with activity respectively in anterior and posterior brain structures, and further suggest a distinction between how attention modulates processing under conditions of central cueing and peripheral cueing.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18955038     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  11 in total

1.  Attentional modulation of visual responses by flexible input gain.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Ghose
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object.

Authors:  Steven A Jax; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-02-13

3.  The role of the left posterior parietal lobule in top-down modulation on space-based attention: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Lin Chen; Ke Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Prioritization to visual objects: Roles of sensory uncertainty.

Authors:  Ting Luo; Xia Wu; Hailing Wang; Shimin Fu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The role of cognitive control and top-down processes in object affordances.

Authors:  Thomas D Ferguson; Daniel N Bub; Michael E J Masson; Olave E Krigolson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Saccade latency indexes exogenous and endogenous object-based attention.

Authors:  Gözde Şentürk; Adam S Greenberg; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  On the role of attention in binocular rivalry: electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Urte Roeber; Sandra Veser; Erich Schröger; Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The object advantage can be eliminated under equiluminant conditions.

Authors:  James M Brown; Benjamin A Guenther; Shruti Narang; Aisha P Siddiqui; Nicholas C Foley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

9.  Distinct mechanisms subserve location- and object-based visual attention.

Authors:  Wei-Lun Chou; Su-Ling Yeh; Chien-Chung Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-21

10.  Attentional gain is modulated by probabilistic feature expectations in a spatial cueing task: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Anna Marzecová; Antonio Schettino; Andreas Widmann; Iria SanMiguel; Sonja A Kotz; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.