Literature DB >> 18954972

Impact of total retrieved lymph nodes on staging and survival of patients with gastric cancer invading the subserosa.

Caigang Liu1, Yang Lu, Zhu Jun, Ruishan Zhang, Fan Yao, Ping Lu, Feng Jin, Hua Li, Huimian Xu, Shubao Wang, Junqing Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of total retrieved lymph nodes (tLNs) on staging and survival in patients with pT2b gastric cancer according to the nodal status.
METHODS: Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic outcomes of 392 patients with pT2b gastric cancer between 1980 and 2005 were retrospectively investigated based on the nodal status.
RESULTS: The number of metastatic lymph nodes (mLNs) was highly correlated with the number of tLNs (P<0.001). The overall 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 39.0% (153/392) and 17.9% (70/392), respectively. The survival rates in patients with pN0 cancers did not differ significantly from that in patients with pN1 cancer when the tLNs were 25 or less. However, the survival rate in patients with N0 cancers was significantly greater than that in patients with pN1 cancers when the tLNs were more than 25 (64.3% vs. 36.9%, chi(2)=4.339, P=0.037). Moreover, both 5- and 10-year survival rates differed significantly among patients with pN1, pN2 and pN3 gastric cancer regardless of tLNs. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, tumor focus number, tumor location, and mLN, but not tLNs, were independent prognostic predictors in patients with pT2b gastric cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: To improve the accuracy of staging, no less than 15 tLNs should be pathologically examined in patients with pN1-3, and 25 tLNs for the patients with N0. More tLNs may not be associated with a better prognosis in pT2b disease because the extent of lymph node dissection is pre-defined for the operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18954972     DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0960-7404            Impact factor:   3.279


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of Clavien-Dindo classification in patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Junfeng Zhou; Peiwu Yu; Yan Shi; Bo Tang; Yingxue Hao; Yongliang Zhao; Feng Qian
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of surgical performance and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Zhou Junfeng; Shi Yan; Tang Bo; Hao Yingxue; Zeng Dongzhu; Zhao Yongliang; Qian Feng; Yu Peiwu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  State-of-the-art preoperative staging of gastric cancer by MDCT and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Joon-Il Choi; Ijin Joo; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Incidence and risk factors of postoperative complications after robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an analysis of 817 cases based on 10-year experience in a large-scale center.

Authors:  Zheng-Yan Li; Yong-Liang Zhao; Feng Qian; Bo Tang; Jun Chen; Fan Zhang; Ping-Ang Li; Zi-Yan Luo; Yan Shi; Pei-Wu Yu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Effect of lymph nodes count in node-positive gastric cancer.

Authors:  Wenjie Zhang; Guangyan Zhangyuan; Jincheng Wang; Kangpeng Jin; Yang Liu; Fei Wang; Weiwei Yu; Haitian Zhang; Guoqiang Li; Decai Yu; Huihui Chen; Qingxiang Xu; Beicheng Sun
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopy-Assisted Proximal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer in the Upper Location: Comparison of Oncological Outcomes, Surgical Stress, and Nutritional Status.

Authors:  Kecheng Zhang; Xiaohui Huang; Yunhe Gao; Wenquan Liang; Hongqing Xi; Jianxin Cui; Jiyang Li; Minghua Zhu; Guoxiao Liu; Huazhou Zhao; Chong Hu; Yi Liu; Zhi Qiao; Bo Wei; Lin Chen
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.302

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.