PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic value of history-taking and physical examination of medial collateral ligament lesions after a knee injury presenting in general practice. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 65 years with a traumatic knee injury who consulted their general practitioner within 5 weeks after trauma filled out a questionnaire, underwent a standardized physical examination, and underwent a magnetic resonance imaging scan. Logistic regression analysis was used to test possible associations between determinants from history-taking/physical examination and medial collateral ligament lesions. The diagnostic value of history-taking and physical examination was determined for those variables indicating an association (P <.15) with medial collateral ligament lesions and was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Of the 134 patients included in this study, 35 had a medial collateral ligament lesion seen on magnetic resonance imaging scan. From history-taking, the determinants "trauma by external force to leg" and "rotational trauma" showed an association with medial collateral ligament lesion after multivariate analysis (P <.15). From physical examination, "pain valgus stress 30 degrees " and "laxity valgus stress 30 degrees " showed an association (P <.15). Isolated determinants from history-taking and physical examination showed some diagnostic value; the likelihood ratio positive was 2.0 for "trauma by external force to leg" and 2.3 for "pain valgus stress 30 degrees ." Adding "pain valgus stress 30 degrees " and "laxity valgus stress 30 degrees " from physical examination to history-taking improved the diagnostic value to a likelihood ratio positive of 6.4. CONCLUSION: Medial collateral ligament lesions are frequently seen in patients with traumatic knee injury. History-taking has a diagnostic value, while adding physical examination increases the diagnostic value.
PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic value of history-taking and physical examination of medial collateral ligament lesions after a knee injury presenting in general practice. METHODS:Patients aged 18 to 65 years with a traumatic knee injury who consulted their general practitioner within 5 weeks after trauma filled out a questionnaire, underwent a standardized physical examination, and underwent a magnetic resonance imaging scan. Logistic regression analysis was used to test possible associations between determinants from history-taking/physical examination and medial collateral ligament lesions. The diagnostic value of history-taking and physical examination was determined for those variables indicating an association (P <.15) with medial collateral ligament lesions and was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Of the 134 patients included in this study, 35 had a medial collateral ligament lesion seen on magnetic resonance imaging scan. From history-taking, the determinants "trauma by external force to leg" and "rotational trauma" showed an association with medial collateral ligament lesion after multivariate analysis (P <.15). From physical examination, "pain valgus stress 30 degrees " and "laxity valgus stress 30 degrees " showed an association (P <.15). Isolated determinants from history-taking and physical examination showed some diagnostic value; the likelihood ratio positive was 2.0 for "trauma by external force to leg" and 2.3 for "pain valgus stress 30 degrees ." Adding "pain valgus stress 30 degrees " and "laxity valgus stress 30 degrees " from physical examination to history-taking improved the diagnostic value to a likelihood ratio positive of 6.4. CONCLUSION: Medial collateral ligament lesions are frequently seen in patients with traumatic knee injury. History-taking has a diagnostic value, while adding physical examination increases the diagnostic value.
Authors: S Décary; M Fallaha; B Pelletier; P Frémont; J Martel-Pelletier; J-P Pelletier; D E Feldman; M-P Sylvestre; P-A Vendittoli; F Desmeules Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: David S Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Richard C Ritter; Michael J Axe; Joseph J Godges Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: David S Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Richard C Ritter; Michael J Axe Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Harry P A Wagemakers; Pim A J Luijsterburg; Edith M Heintjes; Marjolein Y Berger; Jan Verhaar; Bart W Koes; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Harry P A Wagemakers; Pim A J Luijsterburg; Edith M Heintjes; Marjolein Y Berger; Jan A N Verhaar; Bart W Koes; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Nynke M Swart; Kim van Oudenaarde; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Johan L Bloem; Patrick J E Bindels; Paul R Algra; Monique Reijnierse; Pim A J Luijsterburg Journal: Eur J Gen Pract Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 1.904
Authors: Nynke M Swart; Kim K van Oudenaarde; Paul R Algra; Partick J E Bindels; Wilbert B van den Hout; Bart W Koes; Rob G H H Nelissen; Jan A N Verhaar; Hans J L Bloem; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Monique M Reijnierse; Pim A J Luijsterburg Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 2.362