Literature DB >> 18954718

Quantitative ultrasound characterization of cancer radiotherapy effects in vitro.

Roxana M Vlad1, Nehad M Alajez, Anoja Giles, Michael C Kolios, Gregory J Czarnota.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Currently, no routinely used imaging modality is available to assess tumor responses to cancer treatment within hours to days after radiotherapy. In this study, we demonstrate the preclinical application of quantitative ultrasound methods to characterize the cellular responses to cancer radiotherapy in vitro. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three different cell lines were exposed to radiation doses of 2-8 Gy. Data were collected with an ultrasound scanner using frequencies of 10-30 MHz. As indicators of response, ultrasound integrated backscatter and spectral slope were determined from the cell samples. These parameters were corrected for ultrasonic attenuation by measuring the attenuation coefficient.
RESULTS: A significant increase in the ultrasound integrated backscatter of 4-7 dB (p < 0.001) was found for radiation-treated cells compared with viable cells at all radiation doses. The spectral slopes decreased in the cell samples that predominantly underwent mitotic arrest/catastrophe after radiotherapy, consistent with an increase in cell size. In contrast, the spectral slopes did not change significantly in the cell samples that underwent a mix of cell death (apoptosis and mitotic arrest), with no significant change in average cell size.
CONCLUSION: The changes in ultrasound integrated backscatter and spectral slope were direct consequences of cell and nuclear morphologic changes associated with cell death. The results indicate that this combination of quantitative ultrasonic parameters has the potential to assess the cell responses to radiation, differentiate between different types of cell death, and provide a preclinical framework to monitor tumor responses in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18954718     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  23 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound Imaging Techniques for Spatiotemporal Characterization of Composition, Microstructure, and Mechanical Properties in Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Cheri X Deng; Xiaowei Hong; Jan P Stegemann
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Assessment of accuracy of the structure-factor-size-estimator method in determining red blood cell aggregate size from ultrasound spectral backscatter coefficient.

Authors:  Ratan K Saha; Emilie Franceschini; Guy Cloutier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference Reference-phantom Method.

Authors:  Kayvan Samimi; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  Analysis of Two Quantitative Ultrasound Approaches.

Authors:  Pauline Muleki-Seya; Aiguo Han; Michael P Andre; John W Erdman; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  Performance evaluation of the spectral centroid downshift method for attenuation estimation.

Authors:  Kayvan Samimi; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Quantitative ultrasound and apoptotic death in the neonatal primate brain.

Authors:  Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Kevin K Noguchi; Laura Castañeda-Martinez; George Kirvassilis; Sophie H Wang; Francesca Manzella; Brant S Swiney; Kobe Masuoka; Saverio Capuano; Kevin G Brunner; Kristin Crosno; Quinton W Guerrero; Hayley Whitson; Ansgar Brambrink; Heather S Simmons; Andres F Mejia; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall; Chrysanthy Ikonomidou
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.996

7.  Monitoring Microwave Ablation of Ex Vivo Bovine Liver Using Ultrasonic Attenuation Imaging.

Authors:  Kayvan Samimi; James K White; Christopher L Brace; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Ultrasound Scattering From Cell-Pellet Biophantoms and Ex Vivo Tumors Provides Insight Into the Cellular Structure Involved in Scattering.

Authors:  Pauline Muleki-Seya; William D O'Brien
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Conventional frequency ultrasonic biomarkers of cancer treatment response in vivo.

Authors:  Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Omar Falou; Hadi Tadayyon; Azza Al-Mahrouki; William Tran; Naum Papanicolau; Michael C Kolios; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 10.  Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; Jonathan Mamou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.