Literature DB >> 1895235

Sensitivity and integration in a visual pathway for circadian entrainment in the hamster (Mesocricetus auratus).

D E Nelson1, J S Takahashi.   

Abstract

1. Light-induced phase shifts of the circadian rhythm of wheel-running activity were used to measure the photic sensitivity of a circadian pacemaker and the visual pathway that conveys light information to it in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). The sensitivity to stimulus irradiance and duration was assessed by measuring the magnitude of phase-shift responses to photic stimuli of different irradiance and duration. The visual sensitivity was also measured at three different phases of the circadian rhythm. 2. The stimulus-response curves measured at different circadian phases suggest that the maximum phase-shift is the only aspect of visual responsivity to change as a function of the circadian day. The half-saturation constants (sigma) for the stimulus-response curves are not significantly different over the three circadian phases tested. The photic sensitivity to irradiance (1/sigma) appears to remain constant over the circadian day. 3. The hamster circadian pacemaker and the photoreceptive system that subserves it are more sensitive to the irradiance of longer-duration stimuli than to irradiance of briefer stimuli. The system is maximally sensitive to the irradiance of stimuli of 300 s and longer in duration. A quantitative model is presented to explain the changes that occur in the stimulus-response curves as a function of photic stimulus duration. 4. The threshold for photic stimulation of the hamster circadian pacemaker is also quite high. The threshold irradiance (the minimum irradiance necessary to induce statistically significant responses) is approximately 10(11) photons cm-2 s-1 for optimal stimulus durations. This threshold is equivalent to a luminance at the cornea of 0.1 cd m-2. 5. We also measured the sensitivity of this visual pathway to the total number of photons in a stimulus. This system is maximally sensitive to photons in stimuli between 30 and 3600 s in duration. The maximum quantum efficiency of photic integration occurs in 300 s stimuli. 6. These results suggest that the visual pathways that convey light information to the mammalian circadian pacemaker possess several unique characteristics. These pathways are relatively insensitive to light irradiance and also integrate light inputs over relatively long durations. This visual system, therefore, possesses an optimal sensitivity of 'tuning' to total photons delivered in stimuli of several minutes in duration. Together these characteristics may make this visual system unresponsive to environmental 'noise' that would interfere with the entrainment of circadian rhythms to light-dark cycles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1895235      PMCID: PMC1180102          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  38 in total

1.  Light-sampling behavior in photoentrainment of a rodent circadian rhythm.

Authors:  P J DeCoursey
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Effects of illumination on suprachiasmatic nucleus electrical discharge.

Authors:  G A Groos; J H Meijer
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Activity rhythms and photoperiodism of Syrian hamsters in a simulated burrow system.

Authors:  B L Pratt; B D Goldman
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1986-01

Review 4.  Organization and function of a central nervous system circadian oscillator: the suprachiasmatic hypothalamic nucleus.

Authors:  R Y Moore
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1983-08

5.  Spectral sensitivity of a novel photoreceptive system mediating entrainment of mammalian circadian rhythms.

Authors:  J S Takahashi; P J DeCoursey; L Bauman; M Menaker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Mar 8-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Bright light flashes of 0.5 milliseconds reset the circadian clock of a microchiropteran bat.

Authors:  D Joshi; M K Chandrashekaran
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1984-05

7.  Effect of one-second light pulses on testicular function and locomotor activity in the golden hamster.

Authors:  D J Earnest; F W Turek
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.285

8.  Saturation and adaptation in the rod system.

Authors:  E H Adelson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Studies of visual function and its decay in mice with hereditary retinal degeneration.

Authors:  U C Dräger; D H Hubel
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1978-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Grating acuity of the golden hamster. The effects of stimulus orientation and luminance.

Authors:  V F Emerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  87 in total

1.  Responses of neurones of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus to retinal illumination under photopic and scotopic conditions.

Authors:  N C Aggelopoulos; H Meissl
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Effects of irradiance and stimulus duration on early gene expression (Fos) in the suprachiasmatic nucleus: temporal summation and reciprocity.

Authors:  O Dkhissi-Benyahya; B Sicard; H M Cooper
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Circadian phototransduction and the regulation of biological rhythms.

Authors:  Mario E Guido; Agata R Carpentieri; Eduardo Garbarino-Pico
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.996

4.  Light exposure patterns in healthy older and young adults.

Authors:  Karine Scheuermaier; Alison M Laffan; Jeanne F Duffy
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.182

Review 5.  Non-image-forming ocular photoreception in vertebrates.

Authors:  Yingbin Fu; Hsi-Wen Liao; Michael Tri H Do; King-Wai Yau
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 6.  How plants tell the time.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Katharine E Hubbard; Carlos T Hotta; Antony N Dodd; Alex A R Webb
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Decreased sensitivity to phase-delaying effects of moderate intensity light in older subjects.

Authors:  Jeanne F Duffy; Jamie M Zeitzer; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Enhanced circadian photoresponsiveness after prolonged dark adaptation in seven species of diurnal and nocturnal rodents.

Authors:  Roberto Refinetti
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-11-20

9.  The adult visual cortex expresses dynamic synaptic plasticity that is driven by the light/dark cycle.

Authors:  Marian Tsanov; Denise Manahan-Vaughan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Circadian phase resetting by a single short-duration light exposure.

Authors:  Shadab A Rahman; Melissa A St Hilaire; Anne-Marie Chang; Nayantara Santhi; Jeanne F Duffy; Richard E Kronauer; Charles A Czeisler; Steven W Lockley; Elizabeth B Klerman
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.