BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Micropos 4DRT system is being developed to provide accurate, precise, objective, and continuous target localization during radiotherapy. This study involves the first in vivo use of the system, aiming to evaluate the localization accuracy of this electromagnetic positioning technique compared with radiographic localization and to assess its real-time tracking ability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An active positioning marker was inserted in the prostatic urethra of 10 patients scheduled to receive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. A receiving sensor plate (antennae system) was placed at a known position in the treatment tabletop. Initial in vivo system calibrations were performed in three subjects. Ten additional patients were then enrolled in a study arm that compared radiographic transponder location to radiotransponder location simultaneously acquired by the Micropos 4DRT system. Frontal and side radiographs were taken with the radiopaque transponder located at three different positions within the prostatic urethra. RESULTS: The transponder insertions were all successful and without complications. Comparison of the transponder location as per the Micropos 4DRT system with the radiographic transponder localization showed an average (+/-SD) absolute and relative 3D difference of 2.7+/-1.2 and 1.7+/-1.0mm, respectively. Continuous transponder tracking capability was also demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Electromagnetic positioning using the Micropos transponder system is feasible in vivo. Evaluation of this novel non-ionizing localization system, in this study using a transponder positioned in the prostatic urethra, indicates transponder localization accuracy to isocenter comparable with X-ray localization of a radiopaque marker.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Micropos 4DRT system is being developed to provide accurate, precise, objective, and continuous target localization during radiotherapy. This study involves the first in vivo use of the system, aiming to evaluate the localization accuracy of this electromagnetic positioning technique compared with radiographic localization and to assess its real-time tracking ability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An active positioning marker was inserted in the prostatic urethra of 10 patients scheduled to receive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. A receiving sensor plate (antennae system) was placed at a known position in the treatment tabletop. Initial in vivo system calibrations were performed in three subjects. Ten additional patients were then enrolled in a study arm that compared radiographic transponder location to radiotransponder location simultaneously acquired by the Micropos 4DRT system. Frontal and side radiographs were taken with the radiopaque transponder located at three different positions within the prostatic urethra. RESULTS: The transponder insertions were all successful and without complications. Comparison of the transponder location as per the Micropos 4DRT system with the radiographic transponder localization showed an average (+/-SD) absolute and relative 3D difference of 2.7+/-1.2 and 1.7+/-1.0mm, respectively. Continuous transponder tracking capability was also demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Electromagnetic positioning using the Micropos transponder system is feasible in vivo. Evaluation of this novel non-ionizing localization system, in this study using a transponder positioned in the prostatic urethra, indicates transponder localization accuracy to isocenter comparable with X-ray localization of a radiopaque marker.
Authors: Matthew Richardson; Mark Sidhom; Sarah Gallagher; Mel Grand; David Pryor; Joseph Bucci; Lee Wilton; Sankar Arumugam; Sarah Keats; Jarad M Martin Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Alexander Grimwood; Helen A McNair; Tuathan P O'Shea; Stephen Gilroy; Karen Thomas; Jeffrey C Bamber; Alison C Tree; Emma J Harris Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Denis Panizza; Valeria Faccenda; Raffaella Lucchini; Martina Camilla Daniotti; Sara Trivellato; Paolo Caricato; Valerio Pisoni; Elena De Ponti; Stefano Arcangeli Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 5.738