Literature DB >> 18952267

Shock wave lithotripsy not associated with development of diabetes mellitus at 6 years of follow-up.

Antoine A Makhlouf1, Daniel Thorner, Roland Ugarte, Manoj Monga.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the hypothesis that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) increases the incident risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM). Studies have suggested that ESWL predisposes to DM.
METHODS: Using a mail survey, we collected data on the presence and onset of DM in 1947 patients treated with the Medstone-STS electrohydraulic lithotripter from 1999 to 2002. These patients were matched by age, sex, and body mass index to controls from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database. Of the 1947 patients, 4% could not be matched and were excluded, leaving 1869 for analysis, of whom 60.0% were men. The mean age was 51.9 years at ESWL and the median follow-up was 6 years. The mean body mass index at the end of the study was 28.6 kg/m(2).
RESULTS: At ESWL, 8.67% of matched patients had a diagnosis of DM. This had increased to 13.9% at the time of survey. In the NHANES group, 8.34% had DM at the time the ESWL group underwent treatment, and this had increased to 14.1% at the NHANES survey. Therefore, the rate of new DM cases in the ESWL group was similar to that in the NHANES group (5.2% vs 5.8%, respectively; P = .47). Multivariate analysis of the patient cohort confirmed that age, sex, body mass index, and family history correlated with development of DM and that the laterality of treatment and number of treatments or shocks given were not significant predictors of DM.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that patients treated with ESWL do not develop DM at a greater rate than does the general population at 6 years of follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18952267     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Shock wave lithotripsy targeting of the kidney and pancreas does not increase the severity of metabolic syndrome in a porcine model.

Authors:  Rajash K Handa; Andrew P Evan; Bret A Connors; Cynthia D Johnson; Ziyue Liu; Mouhamad Alloosh; Michael Sturek; Carmella Evans-Molina; Jessica A Mandeville; Ehud Gnessin; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  New-onset diabetes mellitus after shock wave lithotripsy for urinary stone: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tuo Deng; Banghua Liao; Ye Tian; Deyi Luo; Jiaming Liu; Tao Jin; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Andrew C Lawler; Eric M Ghiraldi; Carmen Tong; Justin I Friedlander
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Evaluation of long-term side effects after shock-wave lithotripsy for renal calculi using a third generation electromagnetic lithotripter.

Authors:  Giacomo Maria Pirola; Salvatore Micali; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Eugenio Martorana; Angelo Territo; Stefano Puliatti; Giampaolo Bianchi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Prevalence of diabetes mellitus after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 15 years follow-up.

Authors:  Fahimeh Kazemi Rashed; Nader Rash Ahmadi; Ali Zolfaghari; Alireza Farshi; Mohsen Amjadi; Mahboobeh Gholipour
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

6.  How do we know what damage a safe intervention has in the long-term: Considering the risk of extra-corporeal shockwave lithotripsy and the onset of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jaspal S Phull; Omar M Aboumarzouk
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.