Literature DB >> 18951740

[Which factors influence screening practices for female cancer in France?].

N Duport1, D Serra, H Goulard, J Bloch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The two aims of the study were, first to estimate the declared two-year coverage of breast cancer and cervical cancer screenings, and second to determine the main factors influencing female cancer screening behaviors.
METHODS: Three groups of women from the 2003 French decennial health interview survey were analyzed: 3378 women aged 50-74 years who answered the question on mammography use, 7912 women aged 25-65 years who answered the question on Pap-smear use, and 2528 women aged 50-65 years who answered both questions.
RESULTS: The declared coverage of breast cancer screening was 71.2%, the declared coverage of cervical cancer screening was 76.3%. Almost 18% of women declared having undergone neither a mammography nor a Pap-smear in the last two years. The main factor linked to a more frequent practice of one or both cancer screenings (breast or cervix) was to have undergone recently the other screening. The other factors linked to mammography use were mainly healthcare and practitioner access variables. Those linked to Pap-smear use were mainly socioeconomic and socio-demographic variables, healthcare and practitioner access variables being also linked. The main factors linked to having undergone none of these two screenings were of financial nature, particularly household income and home ownership.
CONCLUSION: The study showed that it is appropriate to communicate on both screenings at the same time since they have a positive effect each other. Finally, practitioners continue to play a central role in collecting information on cancer screenings and encouraging screening in women not regularly screened.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18951740     DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2008.07.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique        ISSN: 0398-7620            Impact factor:   1.019


  9 in total

1.  Effect of pay-for-performance on cervical cancer screening participation in France.

Authors:  Panayotis Constantinou; Jonathan Sicsic; Carine Franc
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2016-12-22

2.  Adherence to cancer screening guidelines in Australian survivors of allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation (BMT).

Authors:  Gemma Dyer; Stephen R Larsen; Nicole Gilroy; Lisa Brice; Matt Greenwood; Mark Hertzberg; Masura Kabir; Louisa Brown; Megan Hogg; Gillian Huang; John Moore; David Gottlieb; John Kwan; Jeff Tan; Christopher Ward; Ian Kerridge
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.452

3.  Factors associated with the achievement of cervical smears by general practitioners.

Authors:  Michaël Rochoy; Thibaut Raginel; Jonathan Favre; Estelle Soueres; Nassir Messaadi; Valérie Deken; Alain Duhamel; Christophe Berkhout
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-12-08

4.  Describing the association between socioeconomic inequalities and cancer survival: methodological guidelines and illustration with population-based data.

Authors:  Aurélien Belot; Laurent Remontet; Bernard Rachet; Olivier Dejardin; Hadrien Charvat; Simona Bara; Anne-Valérie Guizard; Laurent Roche; Guy Launoy; Nadine Bossard
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Does mammogram attendance influence participation in cervical and colorectal cancer screening? A prospective study among 1856 French women.

Authors:  Aurélie Bertaut; Julien Coudert; Leila Bengrine; Vincent Dancourt; Christine Binquet; Serge Douvier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  General practitioners who never perform Pap smear: the medical offer and the socio-economic context around their office could limit their involvement in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Chiara Maj; Lorraine Poncet; Henri Panjo; Arnaud Gautier; Pierre Chauvin; Gwenn Menvielle; Emmanuelle Cadot; Virginie Ringa; Laurent Rigal
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Social and territorial inequalities in breast and cervical cancers screening uptake: a cross-sectional study in France.

Authors:  Cyrille Delpierre; Pascale Grosclaude; Lisa Ouanhnon; Marie-Eve Rougé Bugat; Sebastien Lamy; Vladimir Druel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The association between cervical cancer screening participation and the deprivation index of the location of the family doctor's office.

Authors:  Fanny Serman; Jonathan Favre; Valérie Deken; Lydia Guittet; Claire Collins; Michaël Rochoy; Nassir Messaadi; Alain Duhamel; Ludivine Launay; Christophe Berkhout; Thibaut Raginel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Temporal trend in socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of cancer screening programmes in France between 2005 and 2010: results from the Cancer Barometer surveys.

Authors:  David Mark Kelly; Carla Estaquio; Christophe Léon; Pierre Arwidson; Hermann Nabi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.