Literature DB >> 1895169

Birth setting for low-risk pregnancies. An analysis of the current literature.

L L Albers1, V L Katz.   

Abstract

This article reviews the literature on birth settings for women with low-risk pregnancies. Methodological issues of the existing research include nonrandom designs, small samples, selection differences, data limitation, and confounding bias. Studies for four birth sites are summarized: the home, freestanding birth centers, in-hospital birthing centers or birthing rooms, and traditional hospital settings. Despite the methodological limitations, nontraditional birth settings present advantages for low-risk women as compared with traditional hospital settings: lower costs for maternity care, and lower use of childbirth procedures, without significant differences in perinatal mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1895169     DOI: 10.1016/0091-2182(91)90081-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurse Midwifery        ISSN: 0091-2182


  6 in total

1.  Outcomes, safety, and resource utilization in a collaborative care birth center program compared with traditional physician-based perinatal care.

Authors:  Debra J Jackson; Janet M Lang; William H Swartz; Theodore G Ganiats; Judith Fullerton; Jeffrey Ecker; Uyensa Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Outcome in low risk pregnancies.

Authors:  R Arya; T Pethen; R B Johanson; S A Spencer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Should there be a trial of home versus hospital delivery in the United Kingdom?

Authors:  T Dowswell; J G Thornton; J Hewison; R J Lilford; J Raisler; A Macfarlane; G Young; M Newburn; R Dodds; R S Settatree
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-23

4.  Is the operative delivery rate in low-risk women dependent on the level of birth care? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S Bernitz; R Rolland; E Blix; M Jacobsen; K Sjøborg; P Øian
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Cost analysis of the Dutch obstetric system: low-risk nulliparous women preferring home or short-stay hospital birth--a prospective non-randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Marijke Jc Hendrix; Silvia Maa Evers; Marloes Cm Basten; Jan G Nijhuis; Johan L Severens
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  The impact on neonatal mortality of shifting childbirth services among levels of hospitals: Taiwan's experience.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Sylvia H Hsu; Li-Kuei Chen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.