Literature DB >> 18950815

Effects of urinary tract infection in patients with bladder augmentation and kidney transplantation.

Daniel Alcântara Pereira1, Ubirajara Barroso, Paula Machado, José Osmar Medina Pestana, Thiago Elias Rosito, Jesus Pires, Cláudio Almeida, Valdemar Ortiz, Antonio Macedo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the rate of function decline of the renal allograft in patients with augmented bladder. We also evaluated the prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infection in these patients, and to demonstrate if these findings are predictors of allograft function decline, comparing children who underwent bladder augmentation with a control group.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 170 children and adolescents undergoing renal transplantation at our institution 23 (14%) had previously undergone bladder augmentation. These patients were retrospectively compared (1:2 ratio) to 42 controls matched for gender, age, race, donor type, weight and immunosuppression protocol. The type of donor (living or cadaver), rate of acute tubular necrosis and cold ischemia time during transplantation were also similar between groups.
RESULTS: Mean followup was 18.0 +/- 13.9 months and 25.2 +/- 14.1 months for the augmented and nonaugmented bladder groups, respectively (p >0.05). The incidence of acute rejection within the first 12 months of kidney transplantation was 9% in the bladder augmentation group and 26% in controls (p >0.05). The rate of urinary tract infection or asymptomatic bacteriuria in the first 12 months after kidney transplantation was higher in the bladder augmentation group (19 patients, 83%) compared to controls (7 patients, 17%, p <0.001). Patients with augmented bladder had a higher number of hospital admissions (14 patients, 61%) compared to the control group (12 patients, 29%, p = 0.004). Despite the higher incidence of urinary tract infection in the augmented bladder group, there was no statistically significant difference in graft function between the groups at 6 months (1.1 +/- 0.3 mg/dl vs 1.0 +/- 0.3 mg/dl) or 12 months (1.0 +/- 0.2 mg/dl vs 1.2 +/- 0.7 mg/dl) after transplantation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that patients with transplanted kidney and augmented bladder had more asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infections than those without bladder augmentation. However, the rate of graft survival was similar between the groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18950815     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

1.  Renal transplantation in patients with an augmentation cystoplasty.

Authors:  Jin Sun Choi; Hyunmin Ko; Hyo Kee Kim; Chris Chung; Ahram Han; Seung-Kee Min; Jongwon Ha; Sangil Min
Journal:  Korean J Transplant       Date:  2020-10-30

Review 2.  Renal transplantation in augmented bladders.

Authors:  P López Pereira; M J Martínez Urrutia; R Lobato; E Jaureguizar
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Renal transplant outcome in children with an augmented bladder.

Authors:  P Lopez Pereira; Ruben Ortiz Rodriguez; Carlota Fernandez Camblor; María José Martínez Urrutia; Roberto Lobato Romera; Laura Espinosa; Enrique Jaureguizar Monereo
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Urological Complications Associated With Pyeloureterostomy Without Ipsilateral Nephrectomy in Renal Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Hernani M Neto; Helio Tedesco Silva Junior; José M Pestana; Renato D Foresto; Wilson F Aguiar
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.782

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.