Literature DB >> 18948293

Voronoia: analyzing packing in protein structures.

Kristian Rother1, Peter Werner Hildebrand, Andrean Goede, Bjoern Gruening, Robert Preissner.   

Abstract

The packing of protein atoms is an indicator for their stability and functionality, and applied in determining thermostability, in protein design, ligand binding and to identify flexible regions in proteins. Here, we present Voronoia, a database of atomic-scale packing data for protein 3D structures. It is based on an improved Voronoi Cell algorithm using hyperboloid interfaces to construct atomic volumes, and to resolve solvent-accessible and -inaccessible regions of atoms. The database contains atomic volumes, local packing densities and interior cavities calculated for 61 318 biological units from the PDB. A report for each structure summarizes the packing by residue and atom types, and lists the environment of interior cavities. The packing data are compared to a nonredundant set of structures from SCOP superfamilies. Both packing densities and cavities can be visualized in the 3D structures by the Jmol plugin. Additionally, PDB files can be submitted to the Voronoia server for calculation. This service performs calculations for most full-atomic protein structures within a few minutes. For batch jobs, a standalone version of the program with an optional PyMOL plugin is available for download. The database can be freely accessed at: http://bioinformatics.charite.de/voronoia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18948293      PMCID: PMC2686436          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


INTRODUCTION

The packing of protein atoms is an important indicator for their stability and functionality. Measuring the packing of protein structures has been successfully applied to calculate the intrinsic compressibility of proteins (1,2), ligand binding and protein design (3), to find structural determinants for thermostability (4) and to identify flexible regions in proteins (5). Protein packing has recently received importance in assessing the quality of models in tertiary structure prediction (6), and to find water molecules not resolved in the crystal structure. However, tools for the analysis of packing are sparse. Here, we present Voronoia, a database for atomic-scale packing density analysis, also available as a downloadable application. Proteins are not homogeneously packed; in their interior, they contain many atom-sized cavities that preferably locate close to the surface (7). Often, water molecules that reside in these cavities are not detected in crystal structures. We have observed an accumulation of cavities at functionally important sites of membrane channels and transporters (2,8). This conforms to an earlier finding that cavities are crucial for the conformational flexibility of photosynthetic proteins (9). Knowing the position of cavities allows to predict the effects of mutations (10), and thus to engineer proteins with increased stability (11). In neurotransmitter receptors, interior cavities are believed to form the site of action for some anesthetics (12). Several procedures to assess the spatial proximity of atoms in 3D space have been developed, most allocating space to Voronoi polyhedra (13). Atom radii were introduced to apply the Voronoi procedure to proteins (14). This method was further improved by the Voronoi Cell method, using curved instead of planar interfaces and treating atoms at cavities and at the protein surface separately (15). An alternative approach is the Alpha Shape (AS) method (16) which models atoms as self-inflating spheres. Mathematically, this is a generalization of the Voronoi method applicable to a multitude of domains other than biomolecules, but it lacks the ability to calculate packing densities for atoms exposed to the solvent. Finally, the Occluded Surface (OS) method (17) calculates the length of rays protruding from an atom, but overestimates densities for atoms adjacent to cavities (2), making it more difficult to detect subtle packing differences in these regions. The AS and OS methods are available as downloadable programs. While these methods produce reasonable data, there are only few possibilities to report and visualize the results, especially for nonprogrammers. Other software comes with comfortable user interfaces, but has limited usage: SURFNET (18), CastP (19) and CAVER (20) calculate cavities and surface pockets in detail but no packing. Voro3D offers a wide range of functions but is restricted to residue-wise calculation of packing (21).

The Voronoi Cell method

These limitations are overcome by Voronoia, an implementation of the state-of-the-art Voronoi Cell algorithm (15). It includes construction of hyperboloid instead of planar interfaces, assigns individual radii for each atom, and separates the atomic volume between a Van der Waals sphere and a solvent-excluded portion. While the allocation of space is similar to that made by the AS method, the definition of a solvent excluded volume provides an extra level of detail, especially in protein regions with large packing defects. The volumes are calculated numerically by applying a cubic lattice to the protein and calculating each cubiculum separately. This approach reduces computation time to a few minutes for most structures. The resulting per-atom measure is the packing density: where Vvdw is the assigned atomic volume inside the atoms’ Van der Waals radius and Vse is the remaining solvent excluded volume. The Voronoi Cell procedure uses the empirical ProtOr (22) set of atom radii, and distinguishes between buried atoms, surface atoms and atoms neighboring internal cavities.

Voronoia web interface

The calculation of packing files at higher accuracy is a time-consuming process. To allow the user to quickly visualize the packing of a particular PDB structure, we created an online database of packing data for all biological units from the PDB using the Voronoia program. In total, 61 318 pre-calculated packing files calculated with a grid distance of 0.02 Å, the highest accuracy possible. The results may be displayed in textual form, summarizing packing densities for buried atoms in the structure, and for each residue separately. Also, a complete list of interior cavities and their environment is given. For visual inspection, a Jmol-based 3D plugin allows to distinguish tightly and loosely packed regions in a structure, and to locate interior cavities (Figure 1). To query the database, a live search of PDB headers is enabled by an AJAX-based mechanism.
Figure 1.

Screenshot of the 3D visualization of an entry in Voronoia. Here, the glycerol-3-phosphate transporter (PDB code 1pw4) is shown. It has a transmembrane domain, in which a number of nonpolar (blue) and polar (red) cavities indicate regions of enhanced flexibility.

Screenshot of the 3D visualization of an entry in Voronoia. Here, the glycerol-3-phosphate transporter (PDB code 1pw4) is shown. It has a transmembrane domain, in which a number of nonpolar (blue) and polar (red) cavities indicate regions of enhanced flexibility. Reference packing data calculated from a current nonredundant set of 744 structures based on SCOP superfamilies is provided. For each structure in the database, its deviation from the reference values is given as a z-score RMS. If a particular file cannot be calculated, e.g. because the source data violates the PDB format or the file size reaches hundreds of MB, the user will be informed. This database will be updated every 6 months by means of an automatic script. A web interface has been set up at that allows performing the packing analysis for arbitrary input structures. The Voronoia web service performs calculations for most full-atomic protein structures within one to a few minutes. A lattice resolution for the Voronoi Cell algorithm of up to 0.1 Å is available on the web server, which is sufficient for most applications. A standalone version of the Voronoia program is available with and without graphical interface. It uses regular PDB structure files as input, and creates modified PDB files containing packing densities for each atom. Both cavities and their surroundings may be written as separate structure files. Textual reports that summarize all this information and the deviation of packing from reference data are created for each structure. Voronoia is capable of creating these reports for a batch of structures in one go. This also generates average packing values, which may be used as a new reference set. Parameters such as the resolution of the cubic lattice, and the subset of atoms considered may be specified. Options going beyond those of the web database include choosing atom radii between the empirical ProtOr set (22) and a set optimized for molecular dynamics (23). Using Voronoia as a plugin for the PyMOL molecular viewer, the packing density, its deviation from reference values and cavities can be visualized immediately upon calculation.

CONCLUSION

Concluding, Voronoia is the first comprehensive easy-to-use toolkit for packing analysis. It allows browsing of pre-calculated packing densities and cavities, and de novo calculation for single protein structures and data sets, making it useful for a wide range of applications. Voronoia is available at http://bioinformatics.charite.de/voronoia.

FUNDING

European Union 6th Framework Programme Marie Curie Research Training Network ‘DNA Enzymes’ (MRTNCT-2005-019566); Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (740 and 449). Funding for open access charges: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB-449). Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
  20 in total

1.  The packing density in proteins: standard radii and volumes.

Authors:  J Tsai; R Taylor; C Chothia; M Gerstein
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-07-02       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Voro3D: 3D Voronoi tessellations applied to protein structures.

Authors:  Franck Dupuis; Jean-François Sadoc; Rémi Jullien; Borislav Angelov; Jean-Paul Mornon
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Molecular packing and packing defects in helical membrane proteins.

Authors:  Peter Werner Hildebrand; Kristian Rother; Andrean Goede; Robert Preissner; Cornelius Frömmel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Structural basis for high-affinity volatile anesthetic binding in a natural 4-helix bundle protein.

Authors:  Renyu Liu; Patrick J Loll; Roderic G Eckenhoff
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.

Authors:  J Liang; H Edelsbrunner; C Woodward
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Analytical shape computation of macromolecules: I. Molecular area and volume through alpha shape.

Authors:  J Liang; H Edelsbrunner; P Fu; P V Sudhakar; S Subramaniam
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-10-01

7.  Occluded molecular surface: analysis of protein packing.

Authors:  N Pattabiraman; K B Ward; P J Fleming
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.137

8.  The interpretation of protein structures: total volume, group volume distributions and packing density.

Authors:  F M Richards
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1974-01-05       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, and intermolecular interactions.

Authors:  R A Laskowski
Journal:  J Mol Graph       Date:  1995-10

10.  Analysis of void volumes in proteins and application to stability of the p53 tumour suppressor protein.

Authors:  Alison L Cuff; Andrew C R Martin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  29 in total

1.  Correlation to protein conformation of Wide-angle X-ray Scatter parameters.

Authors:  Wael M Elshemey; Abdo A Elfiky; Wissam A Gawad
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  Structural and kinetic modeling of an activating helix switch in the rhodopsin-transducin interface.

Authors:  Patrick Scheerer; Martin Heck; Andrean Goede; Jung Hee Park; Hui-Woog Choe; Oliver P Ernst; Klaus Peter Hofmann; Peter W Hildebrand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A toolbox for developing bioinformatics software.

Authors:  Kristian Rother; Wojciech Potrzebowski; Tomasz Puton; Magdalena Rother; Ewa Wywial; Janusz M Bujnicki
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  An amino acid packing code for α-helical structure and protein design.

Authors:  Hyun Joo; Archana G Chavan; Jamie Phan; Ryan Day; Jerry Tsai
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Structural differences between thermophilic and mesophilic membrane proteins.

Authors:  Alejandro D Meruelo; Seong Kyu Han; Sanguk Kim; James U Bowie
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  NMR structure of the transmembrane domain of the n-acetylcholine receptor beta2 subunit.

Authors:  Vasyl Bondarenko; Tommy Tillman; Yan Xu; Pei Tang
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-05-02

7.  Cloning, Baeyer-Villiger biooxidations, and structures of the camphor pathway 2-oxo-Δ(3)-4,5,5-trimethylcyclopentenylacetyl-coenzyme A monooxygenase of Pseudomonas putida ATCC 17453.

Authors:  Hannes Leisch; Rong Shi; Stephan Grosse; Krista Morley; Hélène Bergeron; Miroslaw Cygler; Hiroaki Iwaki; Yoshie Hasegawa; Peter C K Lau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Characteristics of a PHD Finger Subtype.

Authors:  Daniel Boamah; Tao Lin; Franchesca A Poppinga; Shraddha Basu; Shahariar Rahman; Francisca Essel; Suvobrata Chakravarty
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  MPlot--a server to analyze and visualize tertiary structure contacts and geometrical features of helical membrane proteins.

Authors:  Alexander Rose; Andrean Goede; Peter W Hildebrand
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  RHYTHM--a server to predict the orientation of transmembrane helices in channels and membrane-coils.

Authors:  Alexander Rose; Stephan Lorenzen; Andrean Goede; Björn Gruening; Peter W Hildebrand
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.