Literature DB >> 18947636

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in children: at last the gold standard?

Alaa El-Ghoneimi1, Hisham Abou-Hashim, Arnaud Bonnard, Gilvydas Verkauskas, Marie-Alice Macher, Olivier Huot, Yves Aigrain.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We analyzed our experience with retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy giving special attention to the learning curve, morbidity, and feasibility in a teaching institution.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2004, we performed 104 laparoscopic nephrectomies in 88 children. Only four were performed via the transperitoneal approach, the others being via the retroperitoneal approach; the files of the latter were analyzed. Mean age was 5 years (20 days-15 years). Main indications were pretransplant nephrectomy for arterial hypertension, nephrotic syndrome or uremic hemolytic syndrome (51%), non-functioning kidney secondary to obstruction, reflux or ectopic ureter (38%), and multicystic dysplastic kidney (11%). Bilateral nephrectomy was performed in 13 children.
RESULTS: The lateral retroperitoneal approach was feasible in all cases even for those who had previous renal surgery. Conversion was not needed in any patient. No significant blood loss was observed. Mean operative time was 97 min (range 44-240) for unilateral nephrectomy; 46 nephrectomies were done in less than 90 min. In bilateral cases the mean operative time was 260 min (range 160-390). The operative time was less than 4 h in seven bilateral cases. Postoperative course was uneventful. Hospital stay was 1.9 days (range 1-3) for urological indications and 5 days (range 3-7) for patients with terminal renal disease. The procedure was initially performed by one surgeon, but was then expanded to other surgeons of the team, and safely taught to residents and fellows.
CONCLUSIONS: The procedure is safe, the learning curve is reasonable, teaching is feasible, operating time becomes with experience closer to open surgery without morbidity, and cosmetic results are excellent. This procedure may be considered as the gold standard for nephrectomy in children.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 18947636     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy in children.

Authors:  Hamdan H Al-Hazmi; Hamzeh M Farraj
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

2.  Minimally invasive partial or total nephrectomy in children: a comparison between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.

Authors:  R Pearce; R Subramaniam
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Paediatric computer-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Magnus Anderberg; Christina Clementson Kockum; Einar Arnbjörnsson
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Current trends in pediatric minimally invasive urologic surgery.

Authors:  Dennis J Lee; Philip H Kim; Chester J Koh
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-02-18

5.  Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: a multicentric international comparative study between lateral versus prone approach.

Authors:  Maria Escolino; Giovanna Riccipetitoni; Atsuyuki Yamataka; Imran Mushtaq; Go Miyano; Paolo Caione; Fabio Chiarenza; Peter Borzi; Ciro Esposito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Long-term functional renal outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic upper pole heminephrectomy for duplex kidney in children: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Luc Joyeux; Isabelle Lacreuse; Anne Schneider; Raphael Moog; Josephine Borgnon; Manuel Lopez; François Varlet; François Becmeur; Emmanuel Sapin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.