Maria Escolino1, Giovanna Riccipetitoni2, Atsuyuki Yamataka3, Imran Mushtaq4, Go Miyano3, Paolo Caione5, Fabio Chiarenza6, Peter Borzi7, Ciro Esposito8. 1. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. 2. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Buzzi Children Hospital, Milan, Italy. 3. Division of Pediatric Urogenital Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 4. Division of Pediatric Urology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK. 5. Division of Pediatric Urology, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, Rome, Italy. 6. Division of Pediatric Surgery, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy. 7. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Mater and Royal Children's Hospitals, Brisbane, Australia. 8. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. ciroespo@unina.it.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Very limited informations are currently available about the best approach to perform retroperitoneoscopic surgery. This multicentric international study aimed to compare the outcome of lateral versus prone approach for retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in children. METHODS: The records of 164 patients underwent RPN in 7 international centers of pediatric surgery over the last 5 years were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-one patients (42 girls and 19 boys, average age 3.8 years) were operated using lateral approach (G1), whereas 103 patients (66 girls and 37 boys, average age 3.0 years) underwent prone RPN (G2). The two groups were compared in regard to operative time, postoperative outcome, postoperative complications, and re-operations. RESULTS: The average operative time was significantly shorter in G2 (99 min) compared to G1 (160 min) (p = 0.001). Only 2 lateral RPN required conversion to open surgery. There was no significant difference between the two groups as for intraoperative complications (G1:2/61, 3.3%; G2:6/103, 5.8%; p = 0.48), postoperative complications (G1:9/61, 14.7%; G2:17/103, 16.5%; p = 0.80), and re-operations (G1:2/61, 3.3%; G2:4/103, 3.8%; p = 0.85). Regarding postoperative complications, the incidence of symptomatic residual distal ureteric stumps (RDUS) was significantly higher in G2 (7/103, 6.8%) compared to G1 (1/61, 1.6%) (p = 0.001). Most re-operations (4/6, 66.6%) were performed to remove a RDUS . CONCLUSIONS: Both lateral and prone approach are feasible and reasonably safe to perform RPN in children but the superiority of one approach over another is not still confirmed. Although prone technique resulted faster compared to lateral approach, the choice of the technique remains dependent on the surgeon's personal preference and experience. Our results would suggest that the lateral approach should be preferred to the prone technique when a longer ureterectomy is required, for example in cases of vesico-ureteral reflux into the affected kidney moiety, in order to avoid to leave a long ureteric stump that could become symptomatic and require a re-intervention.
BACKGROUND: Very limited informations are currently available about the best approach to perform retroperitoneoscopic surgery. This multicentric international study aimed to compare the outcome of lateral versus prone approach for retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in children. METHODS: The records of 164 patients underwent RPN in 7 international centers of pediatric surgery over the last 5 years were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-one patients (42 girls and 19 boys, average age 3.8 years) were operated using lateral approach (G1), whereas 103 patients (66 girls and 37 boys, average age 3.0 years) underwent prone RPN (G2). The two groups were compared in regard to operative time, postoperative outcome, postoperative complications, and re-operations. RESULTS: The average operative time was significantly shorter in G2 (99 min) compared to G1 (160 min) (p = 0.001). Only 2 lateral RPN required conversion to open surgery. There was no significant difference between the two groups as for intraoperative complications (G1:2/61, 3.3%; G2:6/103, 5.8%; p = 0.48), postoperative complications (G1:9/61, 14.7%; G2:17/103, 16.5%; p = 0.80), and re-operations (G1:2/61, 3.3%; G2:4/103, 3.8%; p = 0.85). Regarding postoperative complications, the incidence of symptomatic residual distal ureteric stumps (RDUS) was significantly higher in G2 (7/103, 6.8%) compared to G1 (1/61, 1.6%) (p = 0.001). Most re-operations (4/6, 66.6%) were performed to remove a RDUS . CONCLUSIONS: Both lateral and prone approach are feasible and reasonably safe to perform RPN in children but the superiority of one approach over another is not still confirmed. Although prone technique resulted faster compared to lateral approach, the choice of the technique remains dependent on the surgeon's personal preference and experience. Our results would suggest that the lateral approach should be preferred to the prone technique when a longer ureterectomy is required, for example in cases of vesico-ureteral reflux into the affected kidney moiety, in order to avoid to leave a long ureteric stump that could become symptomatic and require a re-intervention.
Authors: Martin Marszalek; Thomas Chromecki; Badereddin Mohamad Al-Ali; Herbert Meixl; Stephan Madersbacher; Klaus Jeschke; Karl Pummer; Richard Zigeuner Journal: Urology Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: C Esposito; M Iaquinto; M Escolino; A Farina; A La Manna; A Savanelli; A Settimi; A Di Mezza Journal: Minerva Urol Nefrol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.720
Authors: M Chad Wallis; Antoine E Khoury; Armando J Lorenzo; Joao L Pippi-Salle; Darius J Bägli; Walid A Farhat Journal: J Urol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: S V Jackman; J A Cadeddu; R N Chen; S Micali; J T Bishoff; B R Lee; R G Moore; L R Kavoussi Journal: J Endourol Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 2.942