Literature DB >> 18946653

[Clinical insignificance of prostate cancer: are there morphological findings?].

B Helpap1, L Egevad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of microfocal nonpalpable and early-stage prostatic adenocarcinoma are currently a topic of strong discussion. We tried to find morphological findings of such insignificant carcinomas of the prostate. STUDY
DESIGN: More than 1,000 consecutive core needle biopsy specimens of prostate carcinoma taken during 1 year (2007) were graded according to the modified Gleason scoring system. The results were correlated to serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and tumor extent in the cores.
RESULTS: Cases with PSA <10 ng/ml and tumor extent <20% frequently (up to 55%) had Gleason scores of 6 or 7a. Cases with PSA >10 ng/ml or tumor extent >20% had higher Gleason scores (>7a). Cancers with tumor infiltration of <1 mm in one of up to 12 cores and PSA <10 ng/ml mainly had low Gleason scores (6 and 7a), but only 5% of the carcinomas in the studied specimens corresponded to such a parameter. Only 25% of such patients had a pT2a tumor after radical prostatectomy.
CONCLUSION: With a very restricted parameter of a microfocal adenocarcinoma of the prostate with a Gleason score <7a, tumor infiltration of <or=1 mm in only one core needle biopsy, and PSA of <or=10 ng/ml, clinical insignificance may be possible, and in agreement with the patient, active surveillance is feasible. However, such cases are rare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18946653     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-008-1867-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  23 in total

Review 1.  [The value of the modified Gleason grading system of prostate adenocarcinoma in routine urological diagnostics].

Authors:  B Helpap; L Egevad
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Burkhard Helpap; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Correlation of modified Gleason grading with pT stage of prostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Burkhard Helpap; Lars Egevad
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.302

4.  Prostate saturation biopsy in the reevaluation of microfocal prostate cancer.

Authors:  L M Boccon-Gibod; N Barry de Longchamps; M Toublanc; L A Boccon-Gibod; V Ravery
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The relationship between tumor volume and the number of positive cores in men undergoing multisite extended biopsy: implication for expectant management.

Authors:  Atsushi Ochiai; Patricia Troncoso; Michael E Chen; Joseph Lloreta; R Joseph Babaian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Distinguishing clinically important from unimportant prostate cancers before treatment: value of systematic biopsies.

Authors:  Y Goto; M Ohori; A Arakawa; M W Kattan; T M Wheeler; P T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer.

Authors:  J I Epstein; P C Walsh; M Carmichael; C B Brendler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors. A contemporary analysis.

Authors:  Patrick J Bastian; Leslie A Mangold; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  [Active surveillance of localized prostate cancer. Significance of prostate core needle biopsies].

Authors:  J Rüschoff; P Middel; P Albers
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 10.  Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of early detected prostate cancer.

Authors:  C H Bangma; S Roemeling; F H Schröder
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improving the reproducibility of the Gleason scores in small foci of prostate cancer--suggestion of diagnostic criteria for glandular fusion.

Authors:  B Helpap; G Kristiansen; M Beer; J Köllermann; U Oehler; A Pogrebniak; Ch Fellbaum
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.201

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.