Literature DB >> 18459581

Correlation of modified Gleason grading with pT stage of prostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy.

Burkhard Helpap1, Lars Egevad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the correlation between modified Gleason score (GS) and pT stage of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. STUDY
DESIGN: Six hundred forty-nine consecutive RP specimens were graded according to the conventional and the modified Gleason grading systems.
RESULTS: A total of 29% of the tumors were upgraded. Both variants of GS correlated with pathologic stage. Stage pT2 tumors were assigned a GS of 3-6 less often with modified grading than with conventional grading (29% and 84%, respectively). The only significant difference of stage distribution between conventional and modified GS was for GS 7, where pT2 was the most common stage with modified grading (54%) and pT3 was most common with conventional grading (67%). Of GS 3 + 4 = 7a tumors, 95% were stage pT2, while 79% of GS 4 + 3 = 7b tumors were stage pT3-4.
CONCLUSION: The stage distribution of modified GSs of RP specimens differs from that of conventional GSs, but a good correlation exists between grade and pT stage. Notably, GS 4 + 3 = 7b was more often associated with high stage than was GS 3 + 4 = 7a.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18459581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol        ISSN: 0884-6812            Impact factor:   0.302


  5 in total

1.  Improving the reproducibility of the Gleason scores in small foci of prostate cancer--suggestion of diagnostic criteria for glandular fusion.

Authors:  B Helpap; G Kristiansen; M Beer; J Köllermann; U Oehler; A Pogrebniak; Ch Fellbaum
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 2.  Clinical implications of changing definitions within the Gleason grading system.

Authors:  Tamara L Lotan; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  [Clinical insignificance of prostate cancer: are there morphological findings?].

Authors:  B Helpap; L Egevad
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  The evolving Gleason grading system.

Authors:  Ni Chen; Qiao Zhou
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Validation of the WHO 2016 new Gleason score of prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Vishal Rao; Gowri Garudadri; Arya Sahithi Shilpa; Daphne Fonseca; S Murthy Sudha; Rakesh Sharma; T Rao Subramanyeshwar; Sundaram Challa
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.