Literature DB >> 18944640

Epiphytic colonization of pear stigmas and hypanthia by bacteria during primary bloom.

V O Stockwell, R J McLaughlin, M D Henkels, J E Loper, D Sugar, R G Roberts.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT Pear blossoms were sampled during various stages of bloom in 1991 and 1992 from orchards at Cashmere, WA, and Corvallis and Medford, OR, for epiphytic populations of culturable bacteria. On stigmatic surfaces, bacteria were isolated from 2 to 32% of blossoms prior to petal expansion and from 47 to 94% of blossoms by petal fall. In general, a lower percentage of hypanthia than stigmas supported bacterial populations. Randomly selected bacteria isolated at population levels of >/=10(4) CFU/tissue were identified by fatty acid methyl ester analysis. Diverse genera of gram-negative and -positive bacteria were identified from the Medford and Cashmere field sites. Pseudomonas syringae and Pseudomonas viri-diflava were isolated from all sites and were the predominant species detected at Corvallis, where they were isolated from 28% of the blossoms sampled on a given date. Because most pear blossoms do not support detectable populations (>/=10(2) CFU/tissue) of culturable bacteria prior to petal expansion, we speculate that introduced biocontrol agents may become established with minimal competition from indigenous epiphytes at early bloom stages.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 18944640     DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.12.1162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytopathology        ISSN: 0031-949X            Impact factor:   4.025


  8 in total

Review 1.  Microbiology of the phyllosphere.

Authors:  Steven E Lindow; Maria T Brandl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Improvement of fitness and efficacy of a fire blight biocontrol agent via nutritional enhancement combined with osmoadaptation.

Authors:  J Cabrefiga; J Francés; E Montesinos; A Bonaterra
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Orchard Management and Landscape Context Mediate the Pear Floral Microbiome.

Authors:  Robert N Schaeffer; Vera W Pfeiffer; Saumik Basu; Matthew Brousil; Christopher Strohm; S Tianna DuPont; Rachel L Vannette; David W Crowder
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Hypersensitive response and acyl-homoserine lactone production of the fire blight antagonists Erwinia tasmaniensis and Erwinia billingiae.

Authors:  Vladimir Jakovljevic; Susanne Jock; Zhiqiang Du; Klaus Geider
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.813

5.  Transmitting silks of maize have a complex and dynamic microbiome.

Authors:  Eman M Khalaf; Anuja Shrestha; Jeffrey Rinne; Michael D J Lynch; Charles R Shearer; Victor Limay-Rios; Lana M Reid; Manish N Raizada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Unexpected diversity during community succession in the apple flower microbiome.

Authors:  Ashley Shade; Patricia S McManus; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 7.867

7.  Antagonistic potential of Pseudomonas graminis 49M against Erwinia amylovora, the causal agent of fire blight.

Authors:  Artur Mikiciński; Piotr Sobiczewski; Joanna Puławska; Eligio Malusa
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.552

8.  Temporal and spatial dynamics in the apple flower microbiome in the presence of the phytopathogen Erwinia amylovora.

Authors:  Zhouqi Cui; Regan B Huntley; Quan Zeng; Blaire Steven
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 10.302

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.