Literature DB >> 34020936

Orchard Management and Landscape Context Mediate the Pear Floral Microbiome.

Robert N Schaeffer1, Vera W Pfeiffer2, Saumik Basu2, Matthew Brousil2, Christopher Strohm3, S Tianna DuPont3, Rachel L Vannette4, David W Crowder2.   

Abstract

Crop-associated microbiota are a key factor affecting host health and productivity. Most crops are grown within heterogeneous landscapes, and interactions between management practices and landscape context often affect plant and animal biodiversity in agroecosystems. However, whether these same factors typically affect crop-associated microbiota is less clear. Here, we assessed whether orchard management strategies and landscape context affected bacterial and fungal communities in pear (Pyrus communis) flowers. We found that bacteria and fungi responded differently to management schemes. Organically certified orchards had higher fungal diversity in flowers than conventional or bio-based integrated pest management (IPM) orchards, but organic orchards had the lowest bacterial diversity. Orchard management scheme also best predicted the distribution of several important bacterial and fungal genera that either cause or suppress disease; organic and bio-based IPM best explained the distributions of bacterial and fungal genera, respectively. Moreover, patterns of bacterial and fungal diversity were affected by interactions between management, landscape context, and climate. When examining the similarity of bacterial and fungal communities across sites, both abundance- and taxon-related turnovers were mediated primarily by orchard management scheme and landscape context and, specifically, the amount of land in cultivation. Our study reveals local- and landscape-level drivers of floral microbiome structure in a major fruit crop, providing insights that can inform microbiome management to promote host health and high-yielding quality fruit. IMPORTANCE Proper crop management during bloom is essential for producing disease-free tree fruit. Tree fruits are often grown in heterogeneous landscapes; however, few studies have assessed whether landscape context and crop management affect the floral microbiome, which plays a critical role in shaping plant health and disease tolerance. Such work is key for identification of tactics and/or contexts where beneficial microbes proliferate and pathogenic microbes are limited. Here, we characterize the floral microbiome of pear crops in Washington State, where major production occurs in intermountain valleys and basins with variable elevation and microclimates. Our results show that both local-level (crop management) and landscape-level (habitat types and climate) factors affect floral microbiota but in disparate ways for each kingdom. More broadly, these findings can potentially inform microbiome management in orchards for promotion of host health and high-quality yields.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pyrus communis; flower microbiome; integrated pest management; landscape heterogeneity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34020936      PMCID: PMC8276804          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00048-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  36 in total

1.  Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Lenore Fahrig; Jacques Baudry; Lluís Brotons; Françoise G Burel; Thomas O Crist; Robert J Fuller; Clelia Sirami; Gavin M Siriwardena; Jean-Louis Martin
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples.

Authors:  Alma E Parada; David M Needham; Jed A Fuhrman
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Nutrient- and Dose-Dependent Microbiome-Mediated Protection against a Plant Pathogen.

Authors:  Maureen Berg; Britt Koskella
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria.

Authors:  Sai Shiva Krishna Prasad Vurukonda; Sandhya Vardharajula; Manjari Shrivastava; Ali SkZ
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 5.415

5.  Characterization of Botrytis cinerea From Commercial Cut Flower Roses.

Authors:  M Muñoz; J E Faust; G Schnabel
Journal:  Plant Dis       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Control of postharvest pathogens and colonization of the apple surface by antagonistic microorganisms in the field.

Authors:  W Leibinger; B Breuker; M Hahn; K Mendgen
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.

Authors:  Benjamin J Callahan; Paul J McMurdie; Michael J Rosen; Andrew W Han; Amy Jo A Johnson; Susan P Holmes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Temporal and spatial variation in bacterial communities of "Jonagold" apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) and "Conference" pear (Pyrus communis L.) floral nectar.

Authors:  Jolien Smessaert; Maarten Van Geel; Christel Verreth; Sam Crauwels; Olivier Honnay; Wannes Keulemans; Bart Lievens
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Comparison and validation of some ITS primer pairs useful for fungal metabarcoding studies.

Authors:  Michiel Op De Beeck; Bart Lievens; Pieter Busschaert; Stéphan Declerck; Jaco Vangronsveld; Jan V Colpaert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Improved Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene (V4 and V4-5) and Fungal Internal Transcribed Spacer Marker Gene Primers for Microbial Community Surveys.

Authors:  William Walters; Embriette R Hyde; Donna Berg-Lyons; Gail Ackermann; Greg Humphrey; Alma Parada; Jack A Gilbert; Janet K Jansson; J Gregory Caporaso; Jed A Fuhrman; Amy Apprill; Rob Knight
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 6.496

View more
  1 in total

1.  The relative abundances of yeasts attractive to Drosophila suzukii differ between fruit types and are greatest on raspberries.

Authors:  Rory Jones; Michelle T Fountain; Nadia A Andreani; Catrin S Günther; Matthew R Goddard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.