Literature DB >> 18941860

Femoral morphology due to impingement influences the range of motion in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Tallal C Mamisch1, Young-Jo Kim, Jens A Richolt, Michael B Millis, Jens Kordelle.   

Abstract

Femoroacetabular impingement due to metaphyseal prominence is associated with the slippage in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), but it is unclear whether the changes in femoral metaphysis morphology are associated with range of motion (ROM) changes or type of impingement. We asked whether the femoral head-neck junction morphology influences ROM analysis and type of impingement in addition to the slip angle and the acetabular version. We analyzed in 31 patients with SCFE the relationship between the proximal femoral morphology and limitation in ROM due to impingement based on simulated ROM of preoperative CT data. The ROM was analyzed in relation to degree of slippage, femoral metaphysis morphology, acetabular version, and pathomechanical terms of "impaction" and "inclusion." The ROM in the affected hips was comparable to that in the unaffected hips for mild slippage and decreased for slippage of more than 30 degrees. The limitation correlated with changes in the metaphysic morphology and changed acetabular version. Decreased head-neck offset in hips with slip angles between 30 degrees and 50 degrees had restricted ROM to nearly the same degree as in severe SCFE. Therefore, in addition to the slip angle, the femoral metaphysis morphology should be used as criteria for reconstructive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18941860      PMCID: PMC2635459          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0477-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  18 in total

1.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: early mechanical damage to the acetabular cartilage by a prominent femoral metaphysis.

Authors:  M Leunig; M M Casillas; M Hamlet; O Hersche; H Nötzli; T Slongo; R Ganz
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-08

2.  [Measurement and description of joint mobility by the neutral zero method].

Authors:  E H Hansen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  1975-11-24

3.  Long-term follow-up of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  B T Carney; S L Weinstein; J Noble
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Remodelling after pinning for slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  J R Jones; D C Paterson; T M Hillier; B K Foster
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-07

5.  The association of femoral retroversion with slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  R H Gelberman; M S Cohen; B A Shaw; J R Kasser; P P Griffin; R H Wilkinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Remodelling in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  M J Moreau
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  The aetiology of primary osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  R O Murray
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Long-term follow-up study of one hundred and twenty-one patients.

Authors:  D W Boyer; M R Mickelson; I V Ponseti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Osteotomy through the lesser trochanter for slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  W O Southwick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset.

Authors:  K Ito; M A Minka; M Leunig; S Werlen; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03
View more
  31 in total

1.  In situ pinning with arthroscopic osteoplasty for mild SCFE: A preliminary technical report.

Authors:  Michael Leunig; Kevin Horowitz; Hannes Manner; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Femoral morphology and epiphyseal growth plate changes of the hip during maturation: MR assessments in a 1-year follow-up on a cross-sectional asymptomatic cohort in the age range of 9-17 years.

Authors:  Karl-Philipp Kienle; Johannes Keck; Stefan Werlen; Young-Jo Kim; Klaus-Arno Siebenrock; Tallal Charles Mamisch
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Subcapital correction osteotomy for malunited slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Lucas A Anderson; Jeremy M Gililland; Christoper E Pelt; Christopher L Peters
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.324

4.  Is the acetabulum retroverted in slipped capital femoral epiphysis?

Authors:  Shafagh Monazzam; Venkatadass Krishnamoorthy; Bernd Bittersohl; James D Bomar; Harish S Hosalkar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Current concepts in the treatment of adolescent femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Manoj Ramachandran; Shin Azegami; Harish S Hosalkar
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Controversies in management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Ashok N Johari; Ritesh A Pandey
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-02-18

Review 7.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: prevalence, pathogenesis, and natural history.

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Michael B Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [Slipped capital femoral epiphysis].

Authors:  C Zilkens; M Jäger; B Bittersohl; Y-J Kim; M B Millis; R Krauspe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Relative femoral neck lengthening improves pain and hip function in proximal femoral deformities with a high-riding trochanter.

Authors:  Christoph E Albers; Simon D Steppacher; Joseph M Schwab; Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Hip impingement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a changing perspective.

Authors:  Harish S Hosalkar; Nirav K Pandya; James D Bomar; Dennis R Wenger
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.