Literature DB >> 18940029

Long-term effects of the Dutch Schoolgruiten Project--promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among primary-school children.

Nannah I Tak1, Saskia J Te Velde, Johannes Brug.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term effects of the Schoolgruiten Project, a Dutch primary school-based intervention providing free fruit and vegetables (F&V). In addition, we assessed whether children's appreciation of the project mediated these intervention effects. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participating schoolchildren (mean age 9.9 years at baseline) and their parents completed parallel questionnaires at baseline, at 1-year and at 2-year follow-up, including questions on usual F&V intake of the child, potential behavioural determinants, their appreciation of the project and general demographics. Primary outcomes were usual F&V intakes as assessed by parent and child self-reported food frequency measures. Secondary outcome measures were taste preference, knowledge of daily recommendations, availability and accessibility for fruit intake. Multilevel linear regression analyses were used to assess differences at second follow-up adjusted for baseline values between control and intervention groups.
SUBJECTS: Reports were available for 346 intervention children (148 parents) and 425 control children (287 parents).
RESULTS: Both child and parent reports indicated that the intervention group had a significantly higher fruit intake at 2-year follow-up (difference, servings/d: 0.15; 95 % CI 0.004, 0.286 for child reports; 0.19; 95 % CI 0.030, 0.340 for parent reports). No significant effects on vegetable intake were observed. Significant positive intervention effects were also found for knowledge of fruit recommendations among boys. Some evidence was found for partial mediation analyses of the effects on fruit intake.
CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that the Schoolgruiten scheme was effective in increasing children's fruit intake and that appreciation of the project partially mediated this effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18940029     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980008003777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  19 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of School-Based Nutrition Interventions on Parents and Other Family Members: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Eman Abderbwih; Melani Ratih Mahanani; Andreas Deckert; Khatia Antia; Nisreen Agbaria; Peter Dambach; Stefan Kohler; Olaf Horstick; Volker Winkler; Amanda S Wendt
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.706

2.  The effect of a healthy school tuck shop program on the access of students to healthy foods.

Authors:  Kirang Kim; Seo Ah Hong; Sung Ha Yun; Hyun Joo Ryou; Sang Sun Lee; Mi Kyung Kim
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 1.926

3.  Exploring subgroup effects by socioeconomic position of three effective school-based dietary interventions: the European TEENAGE project.

Authors:  Nanna Lien; Leen Haerens; Saskia J te Velde; Liesbeth Mercken; Knut-Inge Klepp; Laurence Moore; Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij; Fabrizio Faggiano; Frank J van Lenthe
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 4.  Community-based interventions for enhancing access to or consumption of fruit and vegetables among five to 18-year olds: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rebecca Ganann; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Donna Ciliska; Leslea Peirson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  What works in school-based energy balance behaviour interventions and what does not? A systematic review of mediating mechanisms.

Authors:  M M van Stralen; M Yildirim; S J te Velde; J Brug; W van Mechelen; M J M Chinapaw
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 6.  For whom and under what circumstances do school-based energy balance behavior interventions work? Systematic review on moderators.

Authors:  Mine Yildirim; Maartje M van Stralen; Mai J M Chinapaw; Johannes Brug; Willem van Mechelen; Jos W R Twisk; Saskia J Te Velde
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Obes       Date:  2011-06-09

7.  Differences in fruit and vegetable intake and their determinants among 11-year-old schoolchildren between 2003 and 2009.

Authors:  Claudia Fischer; Johannes Brug; Nannah I Tak; Agneta Yngve; Saskia J te Velde
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 6.457

8.  The Boost study: design of a school- and community-based randomised trial to promote fruit and vegetable consumption among teenagers.

Authors:  Rikke Krølner; Thea Suldrup Jørgensen; Anne Kristine Aarestrup; Anne Hjøllund Christiansen; Anne Maj Christensen; Pernille Due
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  CVD Prevention Through Policy: a Review of Mass Media, Food/Menu Labeling, Taxation/Subsidies, Built Environment, School Procurement, Worksite Wellness, and Marketing Standards to Improve Diet.

Authors:  Ashkan Afshin; Jose Penalvo; Liana Del Gobbo; Michael Kashaf; Renata Micha; Kurtis Morrish; Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard; Colin Rehm; Siyi Shangguan; Jessica D Smith; Dariush Mozaffarian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Enhancing nutritional environments through access to fruit and vegetables in schools and homes among children and youth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Ganann; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Donna Ciliska; Leslea J Peirson; Rachel L Warren; Paul Fieldhouse; Mario F Delgado-Noguera; Sera Tort; Steven P Hams; Maria José Martinez-Zapata; Luke Wolfenden
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-07-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.