Literature DB >> 18938244

Better smelling through genetics: mammalian odor perception.

Andreas Keller1, Leslie B Vosshall.   

Abstract

The increasing availability of genomic and genetic tools to study olfaction-the sense of smell-has brought important new insights into how this chemosensory modality functions in different species. Newly sequenced mammalian genomes-from platypus to dog-have made it possible to infer how smell has evolved to suit the needs of a given species and how variation within a species may affect individual olfactory perception. This review will focus on recent advances in the genetics and genomics of mammalian smell, with a primary focus on rodents and humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18938244      PMCID: PMC2590501          DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  51 in total

1.  Relaxed selective pressure on an essential component of pheromone transduction in primate evolution.

Authors:  Emily R Liman; Hideki Innan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A functional circuit underlying male sexual behaviour in the female mouse brain.

Authors:  Tali Kimchi; Jennings Xu; Catherine Dulac
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Largest vertebrate vomeronasal type 1 receptor gene repertoire in the semiaquatic platypus.

Authors:  Wendy E Grus; Peng Shi; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  A genome-wide screen for hyposmia susceptibility Loci.

Authors:  Jayant M Pinto; Sanguansak Thanaviratananich; M Geoffrey Hayes; Robert M Naclerio; Carole Ober
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Grueneberg ganglion cells mediate alarm pheromone detection in mice.

Authors:  Julien Brechbühl; Magali Klaey; Marie-Christine Broillet
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Extensive copy-number variation of the human olfactory receptor gene family.

Authors:  Janet M Young; Raelynn M Endicott; Sean S Parghi; Megan Walker; Jeffrey M Kidd; Barbara J Trask
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Canine olfactory receptor gene polymorphism and its relation to odor detection performance by sniffer dogs.

Authors:  Anna Lesniak; Marta Walczak; Tadeusz Jezierski; Mariusz Sacharczuk; Maciej Gawkowski; Kazimierz Jaszczak
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  Similar numbers but different repertoires of olfactory receptor genes in humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Go; Yoshihito Niimura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Genomic drift and copy number variation of sensory receptor genes in humans.

Authors:  Masafumi Nozawa; Yoshihiro Kawahara; Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  High-resolution copy-number variation map reflects human olfactory receptor diversity and evolution.

Authors:  Yehudit Hasin; Tsviya Olender; Miriam Khen; Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui; Philip M Kim; Alexander Eckehart Urban; Michael Snyder; Mark B Gerstein; Doron Lancet; Jan O Korbel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Are mammal olfactory signals hiding right under our noses?

Authors:  Peter James Apps
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-05-15

2.  Molecular components of signal amplification in olfactory sensory cilia.

Authors:  Thomas Hengl; Hiroshi Kaneko; Kristin Dauner; Kerstin Vocke; Stephan Frings; Frank Möhrlen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  A taste of the Drosophila gustatory receptors.

Authors:  Craig Montell
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Simple and Computer-assisted Olfactory Testing for Mice.

Authors:  Emanuele Brai; Lavinia Alberi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Ecological adaptation determines functional mammalian olfactory subgenomes.

Authors:  Sara Hayden; Michaël Bekaert; Tess A Crider; Stefano Mariani; William J Murphy; Emma C Teeling
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Age-Related Olfactory Decline is Associated with the BDNF Val66met Polymorphism: Evidence from a Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Margareta Hedner; Lars-Göran Nilsson; Jonas K Olofsson; Olle Bergman; Elias Eriksson; Lars Nyberg; Maria Larsson
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 7.  Olfactory receptors: G protein-coupled receptors and beyond.

Authors:  Marc Spehr; Steven D Munger
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 5.372

8.  Loss-of-function mutations in sodium channel Nav1.7 cause anosmia.

Authors:  Jan Weiss; Martina Pyrski; Eric Jacobi; Bernd Bufe; Vivienne Willnecker; Bernhard Schick; Philippe Zizzari; Samuel J Gossage; Charles A Greer; Trese Leinders-Zufall; C Geoffrey Woods; John N Wood; Frank Zufall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Functional evolution of mammalian odorant receptors.

Authors:  Kaylin A Adipietro; Joel D Mainland; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  YY1's DNA-binding motifs in mammalian olfactory receptor genes.

Authors:  Christopher D Faulk; Joomyeong Kim
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.