Literature DB >> 19660932

A taste of the Drosophila gustatory receptors.

Craig Montell1.   

Abstract

Insects such as the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, rely on contact chemosensation to detect nutrient-rich foods, to avoid consuming toxic chemicals, and to select mates and hospitable zones to deposit eggs. Flies sense tastants and nonvolatile pheromones through gustatory bristles and pegs distributed on multiple body parts including the proboscis, wing margins, legs, and ovipositor. The sensilla house gustatory receptor neurons, which express members of the family of 68 gustatory receptors (GRs). In contrast to mammalian chemosensation or Drosophila olfaction, which are initiated by receptors composed of dimers of one or two receptor types, the functional Drosophila GRs may include three or more subunits. Several GRs appear to be expressed in multiple cell types that are not associated with contact chemosensation raising the possibility that these proteins may have roles that extend beyond the detection of tastants and pheromones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19660932      PMCID: PMC2747619          DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  54 in total

1.  A chemosensory gene family encoding candidate gustatory and olfactory receptors in Drosophila.

Authors:  K Scott; R Brady; A Cravchik; P Morozov; A Rzhetsky; C Zuker; R Axel
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Candidate taste receptors in Drosophila.

Authors:  P J Clyne; C G Warr; J R Carlson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  A Gr receptor is required for response to the sugar trehalose in taste neurons of Drosophila.

Authors:  A Dahanukar; K Foster; W M van der Goes van Naters; J R Carlson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Trehalose sensitivity in Drosophila correlates with mutations in and expression of the gustatory receptor gene Gr5a.

Authors:  K Ueno; M Ohta; H Morita; Y Mikuni; S Nakajima; K Yamamoto; K Isono
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-09-18       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Spatially restricted expression of candidate taste receptors in the Drosophila gustatory system.

Authors:  L Dunipace; S Meister; C McNealy; H Amrein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-06-05       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  A novel family of mammalian taste receptors.

Authors:  E Adler; M A Hoon; K L Mueller; J Chandrashekar; N J Ryba; C S Zuker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  A Drosophila gustatory receptor essential for aversive taste and inhibiting male-to-male courtship.

Authors:  Seok Jun Moon; Youngseok Lee; Yuchen Jiao; Craig Montell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Differentiated response to sugars among labellar chemosensilla in Drosophila.

Authors:  Makoto Hiroi; Frédéric Marion-Poll; Teiichi Tanimura
Journal:  Zoolog Sci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 0.931

9.  Multiple gustatory receptors required for the caffeine response in Drosophila.

Authors:  Youngseok Lee; Seok Jun Moon; Craig Montell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Variant ionotropic glutamate receptors as chemosensory receptors in Drosophila.

Authors:  Richard Benton; Kirsten S Vannice; Carolina Gomez-Diaz; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  116 in total

1.  Evolutionary differences in food preference rely on Gr64e, a receptor for glycerol.

Authors:  Zev Wisotsky; Adriana Medina; Erica Freeman; Anupama Dahanukar
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Motor neurons controlling fluid ingestion in Drosophila.

Authors:  Andrea Manzo; Marion Silies; Daryl M Gohl; Kristin Scott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ionotropic and metabotropic mechanisms in chemoreception: 'chance or design'?

Authors:  Ana Florencia Silbering; Richard Benton
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Visualizing neuromodulation in vivo: TANGO-mapping of dopamine signaling reveals appetite control of sugar sensing.

Authors:  Hidehiko K Inagaki; Shlomo Ben-Tabou de-Leon; Allan M Wong; Smitha Jagadish; Hiroshi Ishimoto; Gilad Barnea; Toshihiro Kitamoto; Richard Axel; David J Anderson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Gustatory receptors required for avoiding the insecticide L-canavanine.

Authors:  Youngseok Lee; Min Jung Kang; Jaewon Shim; Chae Uk Cheong; Seok Jun Moon; Craig Montell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Adaptive Physiological Response to Perceived Scarcity as a Mechanism of Sensory Modulation of Life Span.

Authors:  Michael J Waterson; Tammy P Chan; Scott D Pletcher
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 7.  Genetics of taste receptors.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Cailu Lin; Ichiro Matsumoto; Makoto Ohmoto; Danielle R Reed; Theodore M Nelson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

8.  Multiple channels of DEET repellency in Drosophila.

Authors:  Hao Guo; Kishor Kunwar; Dean Smith
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.845

9.  A simple assay to study social behavior in Drosophila: measurement of social space within a group.

Authors:  A F Simon; M-T Chou; E D Salazar; T Nicholson; N Saini; S Metchev; D E Krantz
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 10.  Aggression and courtship in Drosophila: pheromonal communication and sex recognition.

Authors:  María Paz Fernández; Edward A Kravitz
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.