Literature DB >> 18937278

White-coat effect among older patients with suspected cognitive impairment: prevalence and clinical implications.

Mario Bo1, Bo Mario, Massimiliano Massaia, Massaia Massimiliano, Chiara Merlo, Merlo Chiara, Alessandro Sona, Sona Alessandro, Antonella Canadè, Canadè Antonella, Gianfranco Fonte, Fonte Gianfranco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of white-coat effect (WCE), and its association with individual anxiety and insight of disease, among older patients evaluated for suspected cognitive impairment.
METHODS: This prospective cohort study, conducted in an Alzheimer Evaluation Unit, involved patients aged 55 years or older with suspected cognitive impairment. WCE was defined as a difference of at least 20 mmHg in systolic or 10 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure (BP) measured either by a physician during the visit or by a nurse (before and after the visit), compared with home self-blood pressure measurement (SBPM). Severity of cognitive impairment was evaluated through the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); the Clinical Insight Rating Scale (CIR) and the Guidelines for the Rating for Awareness Deficits (GRAD) were used to evaluate the subject's insight; anxiety disorder was evaluated using the seven-question Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7).
RESULTS: Among 273 subjects, prevalence of WCE was 52%, 32.6% and 30.4%, according to physician and nurse BP measurements, respectively (p = 0.000). Prevalence of WCE did not differ between patients diagnosed with and without dementia, but was higher among patients with than in those without anxiety disorder (70.7% vs 38.2%, p = 0.000). Positive relations were observed between severity of anxiety and insight of disease, which were both inversely related with severity of cognitive impairment.
CONCLUSIONS: WCE is extremely common and is correlated to individual anxiety and insight of disease among older outpatients with suspected cognitive impairment; overestimation of hypertension severity might lead to unnecessary drug treatment and greater health costs in this setting. (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18937278     DOI: 10.1002/gps.2145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0885-6230            Impact factor:   3.485


  6 in total

Review 1.  Doctors record higher blood pressures than nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Isabella A Horvath; Rod S Taylor; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Predictors of the community pharmacy white-coat effect in treated hypertensive patients. The MEPAFAR study.

Authors:  Daniel Sabater-Hernández; Pablo Sánchez-Villegas; José P García-Corpas; Pedro Amariles; José Sendra-Lillo; María J Faus
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-04-27

3.  "Do it-yourself": Home blood pressure as a predictor of traditional and everyday cognition in older adults.

Authors:  Sophie E Yeung; Wendy Loken Thornton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of office blood pressure compared to home blood pressure in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia.

Authors:  Rianne Aa de Heus; Maxime V Tumelaire; Marcel Gm Olde Rikkert; Jurgen Ahr Claassen
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.908

5.  Feasibility of Repeated Assessment of Cognitive Function in Older Adults Using a Wireless, Mobile, Dry-EEG Headset and Tablet-Based Games.

Authors:  Esther C McWilliams; Florentine M Barbey; John F Dyer; Md Nurul Islam; Bernadette McGuinness; Brian Murphy; Hugh Nolan; Peter Passmore; Laura M Rueda-Delgado; Alison R Buick
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Episodix: a serious game to detect cognitive impairment in senior adults. A psychometric study.

Authors:  Manuel J Fernández-Iglesias; Luis Anido-Rifón; Roberto Pérez-Rodríguez; Sonia Valladares-Rodriguez; David Facal
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.