Literature DB >> 1893684

A morphometrical comparison of right and left whole human vastus lateralis muscle: how to reduce sampling errors in biopsy techniques.

J Lexell1, C C Taylor.   

Abstract

In studies of the effects of different training programmes, one muscle--most commonly the vastus lateralis--is used for the experiment while the contralateral muscle serves as a control, at the same time as muscle biopsies are taken from both sides. In order to increase the reliability of such studies, the sources and the magnitude of the sampling errors in the biopsy techniques need to be assessed in detail. In this study, cross-sections of whole right and left vastus lateralis muscle from six young sedentary right-handed men were prepared, and the total number and size of fibres and the proportion of the different fibre types were calculated. A significant difference (P less than 0.05-P less than 0.001) between the right and the left muscle was found for at least one of the three variables in each of the six men, but there was no systematic difference and, therefore, no significant right-left difference for the whole group. The maximum difference between the right and the left side for the mean fibre size was 25% and for the fibre type proportion 5%; these differences are much smaller than the known variation within individual muscles. In conclusion, any study involving biopsies from both the right and the left vastus lateralis may use either muscle for the experiment while the contralateral muscle serves as a control without leading to systematic sampling error, whereas the errors involved in taking small samples from each muscle are much more important to control and to reduce.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1893684     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1991.tb00458.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol        ISSN: 0144-5979


  7 in total

1.  Interlimb differences in parameters of aerobic function and local profiles of deoxygenation during double-leg and counterweighted single-leg cycling.

Authors:  Danilo Iannetta; Louis Passfield; Ahmad Qahtani; Martin J MacInnis; Juan M Murias
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Big claims for big weights but with little evidence.

Authors:  Nicholas A Burd; Daniel R Moore; Cameron J Mitchell; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  High- and Low-Load Resistance Training: Interpretation and Practical Application of Current Research Findings.

Authors:  James Fisher; James Steele; Dave Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Muscle fiber types of women after resistance training--quantitative ultrastructure and enzyme activity.

Authors:  N Wang; R S Hikida; R S Staron; J A Simoneau
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.657

5.  State of Knowledge on Molecular Adaptations to Exercise in Humans: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Kaleen M Lavin; Paul M Coen; Liliana C Baptista; Margaret B Bell; Devin Drummer; Sara A Harper; Manoel E Lixandrão; Jeremy S McAdam; Samia M O'Bryan; Sofhia Ramos; Lisa M Roberts; Rick B Vega; Bret H Goodpaster; Marcas M Bamman; Thomas W Buford
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 8.915

6.  Suction-modified needle biopsy technique for the human soleus muscle.

Authors:  Joshua A Cotter; Alvin Yu; Arthur Kreitenberg; Fadia H Haddad; Michael J Baker; John C Fox; Gregory R Adams
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2013-10

7.  Histomorphological and functional contralateral symmetry in the gastrocnemius muscles of the laboratory rat.

Authors:  Garoa Santocildes; Marc Merino; Federica Fabiani; Teresa Pagès; Mario Marotta; Ginés Viscor; Joan Ramon Torrella
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.921

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.