Literature DB >> 18936374

Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution.

Brian K P Goh1, Yu-Meng Tan, Yaw-Fui Alexander Chung, Peng-Chung Cheow, Hock-Soo Ong, Weng-Hoong Chan, Pierce K H Chow, Khee-Chee Soo, Wai-Keong Wong, London L P J Ooi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To critically analyze a large single-institution experience with distal pancreatectomy (DP), with particular attention to the risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula (PF).
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 232 consecutive patients with pancreatic or extrapancreatic disease necessitating DP over 21 years.
INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-one patients underwent spleen-preserving DP, 117 underwent DP with splenectomy, and 94 underwent DP with multiorgan resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The perioperative and postoperative data of patients who underwent DP were analyzed. This included factors associated with postoperative morbidity with particular attention to the PF (defined by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula) and changing trends in operative and perioperative data during the study period.
RESULTS: The overall operative morbidity and mortality were 47% (107 patients) and 3% (7 patients), respectively. During the study period, the rates of resection increased from 3 cases to 23 per year, and increasingly these were performed for smaller and incidental lesions. The morbidity rate remained unchanged, but there was a decline in postoperative stay and the need for care in the intensive care unit. Pancreatic fistulas occurred in 72 patients (31%); 41 (18%) were grade A, 13 (6%) grade B, and 18 (8%) grade C. Increased weight, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, blood loss greater than 1 L, increased operation time, decreased albumin level, and sutured closure of the stump without main duct ligation were associated with a postoperative PF on univariate analysis. A DP with splenectomy was associated with a higher incidence of grade B or C PF and non-PF-related complications. Ninety-two percent of PFs were successfully managed nonoperatively. Clinical outcomes correlated well with PF grading, as evidenced by the progressive increase in outcome measures such as postoperative stay, readmissions, reoperations, radiologic interventions, and non-PF-related complications from grade A to C PFs.
CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic fistula is the most common complication after DP and its incidence varies depending on the definition applied. Several risk factors for developing a PF were identified. Splenic preservation after DP is safe. The grade of a PF correlates well with clinical outcomes, and most PFs may be managed nonoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18936374     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.10.956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  83 in total

Review 1.  Techniques for prevention of pancreatic leak after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Hans F Schoellhammer; Yuman Fong; Singh Gagandeep
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: a frequent finding.

Authors:  Christin Tjaden; Ulf Hinz; Matthias Hassenpflug; Franziska Fritz; Stefan Fritz; Lars Grenacher; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Is Sutureless Pancreaticogastrostomy More Effective than Single-Layer Duct-to-Mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy in Pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Daniel Kostov; Georgi Kobakov
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2017-06

4.  Spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy in an isolated blunt pancreatic trauma.

Authors:  Alexandre Zanchenko Fonseca; Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle Ribeiro; Orlando Contrucci; Alexandre Pompeo; Adriana Orsetti; Herico Arsie Neto
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-09-27

5.  The treatment indication and optimal management of fluid collection after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Ki Byung Song; Jaewoo Kwon; Young-Joo Lee; Dae Wook Hwang; Jae Hoon Lee; Sang Hyun Shin; Myung-Hwan Kim; Sung Koo Lee; Dong-Wan Seo; Sang Soo Lee; Do Hyun Park; Tae Jun Song; Guisuk Park; Yejong Park; Seung Jae Lee; Song Cheol Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Management of remnant pancreatic stump fto prevent the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy: current evidence and our strategy.

Authors:  Isamu Makino; Hirohisa Kitagawa; Hisatoshi Nakagawara; Hidehiro Tajima; Itasu Ninomiya; Sachio Fushida; Takashi Fujimura; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Radiofrequency is a secure and effective method for pancreatic transection in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results of a randomized, controlled trial in an experimental model.

Authors:  Dimitri Dorcaratto; Fernando Burdío; Dolors Fondevila; Anna Andaluz; Rita Quesada; Ignasi Poves; Marta Caceres; Xavier Mayol; Enrique Berjano; Luis Grande
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with and without splenic vessel ligation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gaurav Jain; Saurav Chakravartty; Ameet G Patel
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  A comprehensive assessment of transfusion in elective pancreatectomy: risk factors and complications.

Authors:  Raphael C Sun; Anna M Button; Brian J Smith; Richard F Leblond; James R Howe; James J Mezhir
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy to treat solid pseudopapillary tumors in children: transition from open to laparoscopic approaches in suitable cases.

Authors:  Jung-Man Namgoong; Dae-Yeon Kim; Seong-Chul Kim; Song-Cheol Kim; Ji-Hee Hwang; Ki-Byung Song
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.