Literature DB >> 18932052

Intention and attention in ideomotor learning.

Arvid Herwig1, Florian Waszak.   

Abstract

Human actions may be carried out in response to exogenous stimuli (stimulus based) or they may be selected endogenously on the basis of the agent's intentions (intention based). We studied the functional differences between these two types of action during action-effect (ideomotor) learning. Participants underwent an acquisition phase, in which each key-press (left/right) triggered a specific tone (low pitch/high pitch) either in a stimulus-based or in an intention-based action mode. Consistent with previous findings, we demonstrate that auditory action effects gain the ability to prime their associated responses in a later test phase only if the actions were selected endogenously during acquisition phase. Furthermore, we show that this difference in ideomotor learning is not due to different attentional demands for stimulus-based and intention-based actions. Our results suggest that ideomotor learning depends on whether or not the action is selected in the intention-based action mode, whereas the amount of attention devoted to the action-effect is less important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18932052     DOI: 10.1080/17470210802373290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  36 in total

1.  Learning at any rate: action-effect learning for stimulus-based actions.

Authors:  Roland Pfister; Andrea Kiesel; Joachim Hoffmann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-05-19

Review 2.  Representing serial action and perception.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Luis Jiménez; Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

3.  Modality-specific effects on crosstalk in task switching: evidence from modality compatibility using bimodal stimulation.

Authors:  Denise Nadine Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-16

4.  Free choice tasks as random generation tasks: an investigation through working memory manipulations.

Authors:  Christoph Naefgen; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Action-effect associations revealed by eye movements.

Authors:  Arvid Herwig; Gernot Horstmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

Review 6.  A review of ideomotor approaches to perception, cognition, action, and language: advancing a cultural recycling hypothesis.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; Iring Koch; Andrea M Philipp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-23

7.  Why free choices take longer than forced choices: evidence from response threshold manipulations.

Authors:  Christoph Naefgen; Michael Dambacher; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-03

8.  Action-effects enhance explicit sequential learning.

Authors:  Sarah Esser; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-16

9.  Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.

Authors:  Edina Fintor; Denise N Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-03

10.  The benefit of no choice: goal-directed plans enhance perceptual processing.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Michael Dambacher; Maik Bieleke; Peter M Gollwitzer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.