Literature DB >> 18930749

Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences.

Ana Raposo1, Helen E Moss, Emmanuel A Stamatakis, Lorraine K Tyler.   

Abstract

Recent research has indicated that processing different kinds of action verbs, such as those related to arm or leg movements (e.g. grab, kick), engages regions along the motor strip responsible for the execution of the corresponding actions. It has been proposed that this activation reflects action-related meaning and that these regions are automatically triggered whenever action words are encountered. However, this view is not universally shared by cognitive studies that have shown that the representation of verbs is highly dependent on the interactions with the semantic context. We investigated these views in a set of fMRI studies, in which participants performed a movement localiser task and listened to arm- and leg-related verbs that were presented in isolation (e.g. kick), in literal sentences (as in kick the ball) and idiomatic sentences (as in kick the bucket). We found significant activation in motor regions when action verbs were presented in isolation, and, to a lesser extent, in literal sentential contexts. When the same verbs were presented in idiomatic contexts, activation was found in fronto-temporal regions, associated with language processing, but not in motor and premotor cortices. These results suggest that motor responses were context-dependent, rather than automatic and invariable. These findings lend support to cognitive theories of semantic flexibility, by showing that the nature of the semantic context determines the degree to which alternative senses and particularly relevant features are processed when a word is heard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18930749     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  86 in total

1.  Do task-irrelevant direction-associated motion verbs affect action planning? Evidence from a Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  Carolin Dudschig; Martin Lachmair; Irmgard de la Vega; Monica De Filippis; Barbara Kaup
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

2.  Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations.

Authors:  Wessel O van Dam; Margriet van Dijk; Harold Bekkering; Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Metaphorically feeling: comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Randall Stilla; K Sathian
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Understanding of action-related and abstract verbs in comparison: a behavioral and TMS study.

Authors:  Alessandro Innocenti; Elisa De Stefani; Mariateresa Sestito; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-10-11

5.  Passive reading and motor imagery about hand actions and tool-use actions: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Hua Shu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Root versus roof: automatic activation of location information during word processing.

Authors:  Martin Lachmair; Carolin Dudschig; Monica De Filippis; Irmgard de la Vega; Barbara Kaup
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

7.  Situational influences on rhythmicity in speech, music, and their interaction.

Authors:  Sarah Hawkins
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Are the motor features of verb meanings represented in the precentral motor cortices? Yes, but within the context of a flexible, multilevel architecture for conceptual knowledge.

Authors:  David Kemmerer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

Review 9.  Three symbol ungrounding problems: Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition.

Authors:  Guy Dove
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 10.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of conceptual processing in healthy adults and patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Tatiana Sitnikova; Christopher Perrone; Donald Goff; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.