PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy and prognostic significance of post-treatment [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma after radiotherapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a retrospective study of 188 patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma who had undergone FDG-PET within 12 months after completing RT. All living patients had >/=1 year of follow-up after FDG-PET. All patients had undergone intensity-modulated RT, 128 with definitive and 60 with postoperative intensity-modulated RT. RESULTS: For all patients, the median follow-up after RT completion was 32.6 months and after FDG-PET was 29.2 months. For the neck, 171 patients had negative FDG-PET findings. Of these results, two were falsely negative. Seventeen patients had positive FDG-PET findings, of which 12 were true-positive findings. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for FDG-PET in the assessment of the treatment response in the neck was 86%, 97%, 71%, and 99%, respectively. For the primary site, 151 patients had negative FDG-PET findings, of which two were falsely negative. Thirty-seven patients had positive FDG-PET findings, of which 12 were true-positive findings. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for FDG-PET in the assessment of the treatment response in the primary site was 86%, 86%, 32.4%, and 98.7%, respectively. Patients with positive post-RT PET findings had significantly worse 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that the findings of post-RT FDG-PET have a high negative predictive value and are a significant prognostic factor. It can provide guidance for the management of head-and-neck cancer after definitive treatment.
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy and prognostic significance of post-treatment [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma after radiotherapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a retrospective study of 188 patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma who had undergone FDG-PET within 12 months after completing RT. All living patients had >/=1 year of follow-up after FDG-PET. All patients had undergone intensity-modulated RT, 128 with definitive and 60 with postoperative intensity-modulated RT. RESULTS: For all patients, the median follow-up after RT completion was 32.6 months and after FDG-PET was 29.2 months. For the neck, 171 patients had negative FDG-PET findings. Of these results, two were falsely negative. Seventeen patients had positive FDG-PET findings, of which 12 were true-positive findings. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for FDG-PET in the assessment of the treatment response in the neck was 86%, 97%, 71%, and 99%, respectively. For the primary site, 151 patients had negative FDG-PET findings, of which two were falsely negative. Thirty-seven patients had positive FDG-PET findings, of which 12 were true-positive findings. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for FDG-PET in the assessment of the treatment response in the primary site was 86%, 86%, 32.4%, and 98.7%, respectively. Patients with positive post-RT PET findings had significantly worse 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that the findings of post-RT FDG-PET have a high negative predictive value and are a significant prognostic factor. It can provide guidance for the management of head-and-neck cancer after definitive treatment.
Authors: Benjamin J Moeller; Vishal Rana; Blake A Cannon; Michelle D Williams; Erich M Sturgis; Lawrence E Ginsberg; Homer A Macapinlac; J Jack Lee; K Kian Ang; K S Clifford Chao; Gregory M Chronowski; Steven J Frank; William H Morrison; David I Rosenthal; Randal S Weber; Adam S Garden; Scott M Lippman; David L Schwartz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: S S Yom; A S Garden; G A Staerkel; L E Ginsberg; W H Morrison; E M Sturgis; D I Rosenthal; J N Myers; B S Edeiken-Monroe Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-07-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: John E Bayouth; Thomas L Casavant; Michael M Graham; Milan Sonka; Manickam Muruganandham; John M Buatti Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 5.934