Literature DB >> 18929717

Heart rate response to adenosine in patients with diabetes mellitus and normal myocardial perfusion imaging.

Paco E Bravo1, Fadi G Hage, Ryan M Woodham, Jaekyeong Heo, Ami E Iskandrian.   

Abstract

Adenosine infusion, as is used in stress single photon-emission computed tomographic (SPECT) imaging, produces an increase in heart rate (HR) and a decrease in blood pressure (BP). The increase in HR is most likely due to direct sympathetic stimulation rather than a reflex to the decrease in BP. In this study, it was hypothesized that the HR response to adenosine is different in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus (DM) in the setting of normal SPECT imaging results. We studied 60 patients with DM (53% women, mean age 62 +/- 10 years) and 60 controls (50% women, mean age 61 +/- 12 years) (p = NS). All patients underwent adenosine SPECT imaging (140 mug/kg/min for 5 minutes) for clinical indications and had normal perfusion and systolic left ventricular function. HR and BP were measured at baseline and during adenosine infusion. HR ratio was defined as peak HR divided by baseline HR and the change as peak HR minus baseline HR. The change in HR (17 +/- 12 vs 22 +/- 14 beats/min, p = 0.034) and the ratio (1.24 +/- 0.20 vs 1.33 +/- 0.25, p = 0.048) were significantly lower in patients with DM compared with those without DM. The baseline and change in mean BP were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In a stepwise regression analysis model, DM was identified as a predictor of the change in HR (p = 0.022). In conclusion, HR response to adenosine infusion is diminished in patients with DM with normal SPECT imaging results. This is likely due to cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and may carry important prognostic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18929717     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  14 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Cardiac purinergic signalling in health and disease.

Authors:  Geoffrey Burnstock; Amir Pelleg
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.765

3.  The importance of heart rate response during myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Risk stratification for renal transplantation: A role for heart rate response?

Authors:  Matthew Topel; Leslee J Shaw; Joe X Xie
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Prognostic Value of Normal Perfusion but Impaired Left Ventricular Function in the Diabetic Heart on Quantitative Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Hwan-Jeong Jeong; Dong Soo Lee; Ho-Young Lee; SeHun Choi; Yeon-Hee Han; June-Key Chung
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-07-20

6.  Sex and age differences in the association of heart rate responses to adenosine and myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Catherine Gebhard; Michael Messerli; Christine Lohmann; Valerie Treyer; Susan Bengs; Dominik C Benz; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Ken Kudura; Elia von Felten; Moritz Schwyzer; Oliver Gaemperli; Christoph Gräni; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Ronny R Buechel; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Heart rate reserve is a long-term risk predictor in women undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Caroline E Gebhard; Monika Marędziak; Angela Portmann; Susan Bengs; Ahmed Haider; Michael Fiechter; Bernhard A Herzog; Michael Messerli; Valerie Treyer; Ken Kudura; Elia von Felten; Dominik C Benz; Tobias A Fuchs; Christoph Gräni; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Ronny R Buechel; Philipp A Kaufmann; Catherine Gebhard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  The association between heart rate reserve and impaired coronary flow velocity reserve: a study based on adenosine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Tingting Liu; Mingyan Ding; Dandan Sun; Huihui Zhang; Lijuan Guo; Ying Li; Hanzhang Zhao; Fang Zhu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Heart rate reserve during pharmacological stress is a significant negative predictor of impaired coronary flow reserve in women.

Authors:  Ahmed Haider; Susan Bengs; Monika Maredziak; Michael Messerli; Michael Fiechter; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Valerie Treyer; Moritz Schwyzer; Christel Hermann Kamani; Dimitri Patriki; Elia von Felten; Dominik C Benz; Tobias A Fuchs; Christoph Gräni; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel; Catherine Gebhard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  The prognostic value of non-perfusion variables obtained during vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Siddharth Singh; Ayman Farag; Stephanie El-Hajj; Jack Heo; Ami E Iskandrian; Fadi G Hage
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.