Literature DB >> 18929264

Putative golden proportions as predictors of facial esthetics in adolescents.

Rosemie M A Kiekens1, Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman, Martin A van 't Hof, Bep E van 't Hof, Jaap C Maltha.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In orthodontics, facial esthetics is assumed to be related to golden proportions apparent in the ideal human face. The aim of the study was to analyze the putative relationship between facial esthetics and golden proportions in white adolescents.
METHODS: Seventy-six adult laypeople evaluated sets of photographs of 64 adolescents on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100. The facial esthetic value of each subject was calculated as a mean VAS score. Three observers recorded the position of 13 facial landmarks included in 19 putative golden proportions, based on the golden proportions as defined by Ricketts. The proportions and each proportion's deviation from the golden target (1.618) were calculated. This deviation was then related to the VAS scores.
RESULTS: Only 4 of the 19 proportions had a significant negative correlation with the VAS scores, indicating that beautiful faces showed less deviation from the golden standard than less beautiful faces. Together, these variables explained only 16% of the variance.
CONCLUSIONS: Few golden proportions have a significant relationship with facial esthetics in adolescents. The explained variance of these variables is too small to be of clinical importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18929264     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  11 in total

1.  Effects of malocclusions on facial attractiveness and their correlations with the divine proportion.

Authors:  Seden Akan; Ayse Gul Torgut; Hüsamettin Oktay
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Comparative evaluation of facial attractiveness by laypersons in terms of facial proportions and equate it's deviation from divine proportions - A photographic study.

Authors:  Romilkumar Shah; Rahul Nair
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-06-12

3.  The role of the golden proportion in the evaluation of facial esthetics.

Authors:  Alberto Rossetti; Marcio De Menezes; Riccardo Rosati; Virgilio F Ferrario; Chiarella Sforza
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Frontal facial proportions of 12-year-old southern Chinese: a photogrammetric study.

Authors:  Charles Yat Cheong Yeung; Colman Patrick McGrath; Ricky Wing Kit Wong; Erik Urban Oskar Hägg; John Lo; Yanqi Yang
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  A three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis of the facial esthetics of the Miss Korea pageant contestants.

Authors:  Kab Soo Jang; Mohamed Bayome; Jae Hyun Park; Ki-Ho Park; Hong-Beom Moon; Yoon-Ah Kook
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Comparison of 3D Scanning Versus 2D Photography for the Identification of Facial Soft-Tissue Landmarks.

Authors:  T Zogheib; R Jacobs; M M Bornstein; J O Agbaje; D Anumendem; Y Klazen; C Politis
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-01-31

7.  Female Facial Attractiveness Assessed from Three-Dimensional Contour Lines by University Students.

Authors:  Jinwara Jirathamopas; Yu Fang Liao; Ellen Wen-Ching Ko; Yu-Ray Chen; Chiung Shing Huang
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-22

8.  What Is the Most Beautiful Facial Proportion in the 21st Century? Comparative Study among Miss Universe, Miss Universe Thailand, Neoclassical Canons, and Facial Golden Ratios.

Authors:  Chairat Burusapat; Pattariya Lekdaeng
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-02-11

9.  Vertical and horizontal facial proportions of Indian American men.

Authors:  Chakravarthy Marx Sadacharan
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-06-24

10.  Multiracial Facial Golden Ratio and Evaluation of Facial Appearance.

Authors:  Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Nor Farid Mohd Noor; Rehana Basri; Tan Fo Yew; Tay Hui Wen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.