Literature DB >> 18928364

Sequential optimal design of neurophysiology experiments.

Jeremy Lewi1, Robert Butera, Liam Paninski.   

Abstract

Adaptively optimizing experiments has the potential to significantly reduce the number of trials needed to build parametric statistical models of neural systems. However, application of adaptive methods to neurophysiology has been limited by severe computational challenges. Since most neurons are high-dimensional systems, optimizing neurophysiology experiments requires computing high-dimensional integrations and optimizations in real time. Here we present a fast algorithm for choosing the most informative stimulus by maximizing the mutual information between the data and the unknown parameters of a generalized linear model (GLM) that we want to fit to the neuron's activity. We rely on important log concavity and asymptotic normality properties of the posterior to facilitate the required computations. Our algorithm requires only low-rank matrix manipulations and a two-dimensional search to choose the optimal stimulus. The average running time of these operations scales quadratically with the dimensionality of the GLM, making real-time adaptive experimental design feasible even for high-dimensional stimulus and parameter spaces. For example, we require roughly 10 milliseconds on a desktop computer to optimize a 100-dimensional stimulus. Despite using some approximations to make the algorithm efficient, our algorithm asymptotically decreases the uncertainty about the model parameters at a rate equal to the maximum rate predicted by an asymptotic analysis. Simulation results show that picking stimuli by maximizing the mutual information can speed up convergence to the optimal values of the parameters by an order of magnitude compared to using random (nonadaptive) stimuli. Finally, applying our design procedure to real neurophysiology experiments requires addressing the nonstationarities that we would expect to see in neural responses; our algorithm can efficiently handle both fast adaptation due to spike history effects and slow, nonsystematic drifts in a neuron's activity.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18928364     DOI: 10.1162/neco.2008.08-07-594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  44 in total

1.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jongsoo Baek; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Automating the design of informative sequences of sensory stimuli.

Authors:  Jeremy Lewi; David M Schneider; Sarah M N Woolley; Liam Paninski
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Bayesian inference for generalized linear models for spiking neurons.

Authors:  Sebastian Gerwinn; Jakob H Macke; Matthias Bethge
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  A Tutorial on Adaptive Design Optimization.

Authors:  Jay I Myung; Daniel R Cavagnaro; Mark A Pitt
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.223

5.  Searching for optimal stimuli: ascending a neuron's response function.

Authors:  Melinda Evrithiki Koelling; Duane Q Nykamp
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 6.  Computational identification of receptive fields.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Statistical analysis of large-scale neuronal recording data.

Authors:  Jamie L Reed; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2010-04-26

8.  Fast Kalman filtering on quasilinear dendritic trees.

Authors:  Liam Paninski
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  Optimal experimental design for sampling voltage on dendritic trees in the low-SNR regime.

Authors:  Jonathan Hunter Huggins; Liam Paninski
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 10.  Bayesian statistics: relevant for the brain?

Authors:  Konrad Paul Kording
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.