| Literature DB >> 18927614 |
Matthew D Hall1, Luc F Bussière, Robert Brooks.
Abstract
A common approach in the study of life-history trade-off evolution is to manipulate the nutrient content of diets during the life of an individual in order observe how the acquisition of resources influences the relationship between reproduction, lifespan and other life-history parameters such as dispersal. Here, we manipulate the quality of diet that replicate laboratory populations received as a thorough test of how diet quality influences the life-history trade-offs associated with reproductive investment in a nuptial feeding Australian ground cricket (Pteronemobius sp.). In this species, both males and females make significant contributions to the production of offspring, as males provide a nuptial gift by allowing females to chew on a modified tibial spur during copulation and feed directing on their haemolymph. Individuals also have two distinct wing morphs, a short-winged flightless morph and a long-winged morph that has the ability to disperse. By manipulating the quality of diet over seven generations, we found that the reproductive investment of males and females were affected differently by the diet quality treatment and wing morph of the individual. We discuss the broader implications of these findings including the differences in how males and females balance current and future reproductive effort in nuptial feeding insects, the changing nature of sexual selection when diets vary, and how the life-history trade-offs associated with the ability to disperse are expected to differ among populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18927614 PMCID: PMC2562459 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003437
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The observed frequencies for the two types of wing morph partitioned by diet quality treatment and sex.
| Micropterous | Macropterous | |
|
| ||
| High quality | 109 | 91 |
| Low quality | 104 | 96 |
|
| ||
| Male | 142 | 58 |
| Female | 71 | 129 |
In total, 20 newly eclosed adult males and females were randomly sampled from each experimental population, yielding 100 males and 100 females per treatment.
The mixed model analyses for the effects of diet quality treatment and wing morph type on estimates of male and female reproductive investment.
| Trait | Diet quality treatment | Wing morph type | Interaction | ||||||
|
| df |
|
| df |
|
| df |
| |
|
| |||||||||
| Average gift size | 1.254 | 1, 10.8 | 0.287 | 0.017 | 1, 134 | 0.897 | 0.170 | 1, 134 | 0.681 |
| No. Copulations | 1.788 | 1, 8.7 | 0.215 | 5.770 | 1, 183 | 0.017 | 1.028 | 1, 183 | 0.312 |
| Attractiveness | 4.527 | 1, 9.2 | 0.062 | 11.650 | 1, 157 | <0.001 | 0.242 | 1, 157 | 0.624 |
| Male lifespan | 5.392 | 1, 9.5 | 0.044 | 0.123 | 1, 195 | 0.727 | 0.530 | 1, 195 | 0.468 |
|
| |||||||||
| Egg number | 6.778 | 1, 8.4 | 0.030 | 1.663 | 1, 195 | 0.199 | 0.408 | 1, 195 | 0.524 |
| Hatching success | 7.492 | 1, 8.1 | 0.025 | 2.326 | 1, 172 | 0.129 | 0.230 | 1, 172 | 0.632 |
| Egg size | 5.567 | 1, 8.3 | 0.045 | 0.520 | 1, 170 | 0.472 | 0.470 | 1, 170 | 0.494 |
| Female lifespan | 0.059 | 1, 8.6 | 0.815 | 0.806 | 1, 193 | 0.370 | 0.518 | 1, 193 | 0.472 |
The model analysed included diet quality treatment and wing morph type as fixed effects, and experimental evolution population nested within treatment as a random effect.
Figure 1The effect of diet quality treatment and wing morph type on male reproductive investment.
The means and standard errors for the diet treatment and wing morph factors are calculated based on the average values for each of the experimental populations.
Figure 2The effect of diet quality treatment and wing morph type on female reproductive investment.
The means and standard errors for the diet treatment and wing morph factors are calculated based on the average values for each of the experimental populations.