Literature DB >> 18926105

Distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes in English hospitals, 2007-08.

J S Brazier1, R Raybould, B Patel, G Duckworth, A Pearson, A Charlett, B I Duerden.   

Abstract

A surveillance study designed to provide a representative sample of the strains of Clostridium difficile causing infections in hospitals in England was in operation from April 2007 to the end of March 2008. Six hundred and seventy-seven isolates were obtained from 186 hospitals in the nine geographical regions of England as recognised by the Health Protection Agency's Regional Microbiology Network. Typing studies revealed that PCR ribotype 027 is now the most common strain isolated from symptomatic patients, accounting for over 41.3% of isolates in English hospitals. Type 106 was the second most common strain (20.2%) and Type 001, which was once the most common strain associated with hospital outbreaks, has now been reduced to only 7.8% of the total. A mixture of 44 other PCR ribotypes accounted for the remaining 28.9% of isolates. This represents a changing distribution of strains when compared to a previous study performed two years earlier which showed roughly equal proportions of types 106, 001 and 027. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the E test method revealed significantly lower susceptibility to metronidazole in the more common strains when compared to the less common ribotypes, although none were classified as clinically resistant. Similarly, no resistance to vancomycin was detected. However, common PCR ribotypes were more resistant to moxifloxacin and erythromycin than the less common strains, which may indicate a selective advantage for resistance to these agents, and combined resistance to these two agents was a good indicator of a common ribotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18926105     DOI: 10.2807/ese.13.41.19000-en

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Euro Surveill        ISSN: 1025-496X


  27 in total

Review 1.  Review of medical and surgical management of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  B Faris; A Blackmore; N Haboubi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Clostridium difficile carriage in elderly subjects and associated changes in the intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Mary C Rea; Orla O'Sullivan; Fergus Shanahan; Paul W O'Toole; Catherine Stanton; R Paul Ross; Colin Hill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Clostridium difficile PCR Ribotype 018, a Successful Epidemic Genotype.

Authors:  Rossella Baldan; Alberto Trovato; Valentina Bianchini; Anna Biancardi; Paola Cichero; Maria Mazzotti; Paola Nizzero; Matteo Moro; Cristina Ossi; Paolo Scarpellini; Daniela Maria Cirillo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Clinical Utility of Laboratory Detection of Clostridium difficile Strain BI/NAP1/027.

Authors:  Larry K Kociolek; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Clostridioides difficile ribotype 106: A systematic review of the antimicrobial susceptibility, genetics, and clinical outcomes of this common worldwide strain.

Authors:  T J Carlson; D Blasingame; A J Gonzales-Luna; F Alnezary; K W Garey
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.331

6.  Evolutionary dynamics of Clostridium difficile over short and long time scales.

Authors:  Miao He; Mohammed Sebaihia; Trevor D Lawley; Richard A Stabler; Lisa F Dawson; Melissa J Martin; Kathryn E Holt; Helena M B Seth-Smith; Michael A Quail; Richard Rance; Karen Brooks; Carol Churcher; David Harris; Stephen D Bentley; Christine Burrows; Louise Clark; Craig Corton; Vicky Murray; Graham Rose; Scott Thurston; Andries van Tonder; Danielle Walker; Brendan W Wren; Gordon Dougan; Julian Parkhill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Extended multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis of Clostridium difficile correlates exactly with ribotyping and enables identification of hospital transmission.

Authors:  S E Manzoor; H E Tanner; C L Marriott; J S Brazier; K J Hardy; S Platt; P M Hawkey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Two case reports of Clostridium difficile bacteremia, one with the epidemic NAP-1 strain.

Authors:  J Hemminger; J-M Balada-Llasat; M Raczkowski; M Buckosh; P Pancholi
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  The A, B, BI, and Cs of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Emergence of new PCR ribotypes from the hypervirulent Clostridium difficile 027 lineage.

Authors:  Esmeralda Valiente; Lisa F Dawson; Michelle D Cairns; Richard A Stabler; Brendan W Wren
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.472

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.