BACKGROUND: Association of mitochondrial haplogroup J with longevity has been reported in several population subgroups. While studies from northern Italy and Finland, have described a higher frequency of haplogroup J among centenarians in comparison to non-centenarian, several other studies could not replicate these results and suggested various explanations for the discrepancy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have evaluated haplogroup frequencies among Ashkenazi Jewish centenarians using two different sets of matched controls. No difference was observed in the haplogroup J frequencies between the centenarians or either matched control group, despite adequate statistical power to detect such a difference. Furthermore, the lack of association was robust to population substructure in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Given this discrepancy with the previous reported associations in the northern Italian and the Finnish populations, we conducted re-analysis of these previously published data, which supported one of several possible explanations: i) inadequate matching of cases and controls; ii) inadequate adjustment for multiple comparison testing; iii) cryptic population stratification. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: There does not exist a universal association of mitochondrial haplogroup J with longevity across all population groups. Reported associations in specialized populations may reflect genetic or other interactions specific to those populations or else cryptic confounding influences, such as inadequate matching attributable to population substructure, which are of general relevance to all studies of the possible association of mitochondrial DNA haplogroups with common complex phenotypes.
BACKGROUND: Association of mitochondrial haplogroup J with longevity has been reported in several population subgroups. While studies from northern Italy and Finland, have described a higher frequency of haplogroup J among centenarians in comparison to non-centenarian, several other studies could not replicate these results and suggested various explanations for the discrepancy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We have evaluated haplogroup frequencies among Ashkenazi Jewish centenarians using two different sets of matched controls. No difference was observed in the haplogroup J frequencies between the centenarians or either matched control group, despite adequate statistical power to detect such a difference. Furthermore, the lack of association was robust to population substructure in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Given this discrepancy with the previous reported associations in the northern Italian and the Finnish populations, we conducted re-analysis of these previously published data, which supported one of several possible explanations: i) inadequate matching of cases and controls; ii) inadequate adjustment for multiple comparison testing; iii) cryptic population stratification. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: There does not exist a universal association of mitochondrial haplogroup J with longevity across all population groups. Reported associations in specialized populations may reflect genetic or other interactions specific to those populations or else cryptic confounding influences, such as inadequate matching attributable to population substructure, which are of general relevance to all studies of the possible association of mitochondrial DNA haplogroups with common complex phenotypes.
Authors: N Mogentale-Profizi; L Chollet; A Stévanovitch; V Dubut; C Poggi; M P Pradié; J L Spadoni; A Gilles; E Béraud-Colomb Journal: Ann Hum Genet Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 1.670
Authors: Owen A Ross; Rose McCormack; Lynn D Maxwell; R Alistair Duguid; Derek J Quinn; Yvonne A Barnett; I Maeve Rea; Omar M A El-Agnaf; J Mark Gibson; Andrew Wallace; Derek Middleton; Martin D Curran Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: Joelle M van der Walt; Kristin K Nicodemus; Eden R Martin; William K Scott; Martha A Nance; Ray L Watts; Jean P Hubble; Jonathan L Haines; William C Koller; Kelly Lyons; Rajesh Pahwa; Matthew B Stern; Amy Colcher; Bradley C Hiner; Joseph Jankovic; William G Ondo; Fred H Allen; Christopher G Goetz; Gary W Small; Frank Mastaglia; Jeffrey M Stajich; Adam C McLaurin; Lefkos T Middleton; Burton L Scott; Donald E Schmechel; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Jeffery M Vance Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2003-02-28 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Jin Zhang; Jordi Asin-Cayuela; Jennifer Fish; Yuichi Michikawa; Massimiliano Bonafe; Fabiola Olivieri; Giuseppe Passarino; Giovanna De Benedictis; Claudio Franceschi; Giuseppe Attardi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-01-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nir Barzilai; Gil Atzmon; Clyde Schechter; Ernst J Schaefer; Adrienne L Cupples; Richard Lipton; Suzanne Cheng; Alan R Shuldiner Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Gil Atzmon; Toni I Pollin; Jill Crandall; Keith Tanner; Clyde B Schechter; Philipp E Scherer; Marielisa Rincon; Glenn Siegel; Micol Katz; Richard B Lipton; Alan R Shuldiner; Nir Barzilai Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Monique D Courtenay; John R Gilbert; Lan Jiang; Anna C Cummings; Paul J Gallins; Laura Caywood; Lori Reinhart-Mercer; Denise Fuzzell; Claire Knebusch; Renee Laux; Jacob L McCauley; Charles E Jackson; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Jonathan L Haines; William K Scott Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Giuseppina Rose; Giuseppe Romeo; Serena Dato; Paolina Crocco; Amalia C Bruni; Antti Hervonen; Kari Majamaa; Federica Sevini; Claudio Franceschi; Giuseppe Passarino Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Emily R Holzinger; Todd Hulgan; Ronald J Ellis; David C Samuels; Marylyn D Ritchie; David W Haas; Asha R Kallianpur; Cinnamon S Bloss; David B Clifford; Ann C Collier; Benjamin B Gelman; Christina M Marra; Justin C McArthur; J Allen McCutchan; Susan Morgello; David M Simpson; Donald R Franklin; Debralee Rosario; Doug Selph; Scott Letendre; Igor Grant Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 2.643