Literature DB >> 18922370

Contemporary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: fixed vs mobile bearing.

Peter M Bonutti1, Daniel A Dethmers.   

Abstract

Contemporary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has shown resurgence in use partly because of studies reporting excellent long-term survivorship. Both fixed-bearing as well as mobile-bearing designs have shown comparable results. Fixed-bearing designs, in particular, implants with metal-backed tibial components have shown more consistent long-term survival, whereas fixed bearings with an all-polyethylene tibial component have had mixed results. Similar to the all-polyethylene tibial component designs, mobile-bearing designs have demonstrated mixed results. One concern with mobile bearings is the high rate of complete tibial radiolucent lines. The keys to long-term survival of both fixed and mobile-bearing designs in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty are patient selection, surgical technique, and surgical experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18922370     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  11 in total

1.  No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Vanessa Pauly; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac; Jean-Noel A Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Bart Stuyts; Tom Vandenlangenbergh; Philippe Cartier; Peter Fennema
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Unicompartmental knee replacement provides early clinical and functional improvement stabilizing over time.

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Michele Vasso; Simone Cerciello; Alessandro Felici
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Obesity has no effect on outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes F Plate; Marco A Augart; Thorsten M Seyler; Daniel N Bracey; Aneitra Hoggard; Michael Akbar; Riyaz H Jinnah; Gary G Poehling
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: are failure modes different?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Daoyun Chen; Chen Zhu; Xiaoyun Pan; Xin Mao; Yongyuan Guo; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The risk of bearing dislocation in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a mobile biconcave design.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Schelfaut; Lucas Beckers; Peter Verdonk; Johan Bellemans; Jan Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Do Fixed or Mobile Bearing Implants Have Better Survivorship in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Arun Kannan; Peter L Lewis; Chelsea Dyer; William A Jiranek; Stephen McMahon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Spontaneous relocation of a posterior dislocation of mobile bearing in a medial unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  Hussein Noureddine; Jaimes Aird; Paul Latimer
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2012-05-31

Review 9.  Outcome of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies between Fixed and Mobile Bearings Focusing on Complications.

Authors:  Young-Bong Ko; Manan Ramesh Gujarathi; Kwang-Jun Oh
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-01

10.  Fixed- versus mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenchao Zhang; Jianpeng Wang; Hui Li; Wanchun Wang; Daniel M George; Tianlong Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.