Literature DB >> 1892023

Localization and needle aspiration of breast lesions: complications in 370 cases.

M A Helvie1, D M Ikeda, D D Adler.   

Abstract

A prospective study of the immediate complications of 370 consecutive breast-imaging procedures (203 wire localizations and 167 radiographically or sonographically guided fine-needle aspirations) is reported. Vasovagal reactions occurred in 27 (7%) of 370 cases, ranging in severity from syncope (four of 370, 1%) to mild light-headedness. These vasovagal reactions were independent of procedure type or use of local anesthesia, but were more common in younger patients. Other complications included prolonged (5 min or longer) bleeding (three of 370, 1%) and extreme pain (two of 370, 1%). One patient was found to have malignant hypertension. We conclude that wire localizations and imaging-guided aspirations are generally well tolerated procedures. However, vasovagal reactions are frequent enough to warrant close observation of patients. Radiologists and breast-imaging personnel should be able to recognize and treat vasovagal reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1892023     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.157.4.1892023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  12 in total

1.  Presurgical localization of breast abnormalities: an overview and analysis of 202 cases.

Authors:  Mahesh K Shetty
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12-30

2.  Computer-aided classification of breast masses: performance and interobserver variability of expert radiologists versus residents.

Authors:  Swatee Singh; Jeff Maxwell; Jay A Baker; Jennifer L Nicholas; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Optimized approach to decision fusion of heterogeneous data for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Jonathan L Jesneck; Loren W Nolte; Jay A Baker; Carey E Floyd; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 3. Physical, psychological and social harm.

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Will screening mammography in the East do more harm than good?

Authors:  Gabriel M Leung; Tai-Hing Lam; Thuan Q Thach; Anthony J Hedley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Stereotactic breast biopsy as an alternative to open excisional biopsy.

Authors:  M J Cross; W P Evans; G N Peters; J H Cheek; R C Jones; P Krakos
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  The value of ultrasound-guided tattooing localization of nonpalpable breast lesions.

Authors:  Kyungran Ko; Boo Kyung Han; Kyung Mi Jang; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Jung Hee Shin; Jung Hyun Yang; Suk Jin Nam
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Hematoma-directed and ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable breast cancer after Mammotome biopsy.

Authors:  Hiroki Inui; Masahiro Watatani; Yukihiko Hashimoto; Toshiya Hojo; Kyoko Hirai; Munehisa Yamato; Makoto Fujishima; Tatsuya Azumi; Hitoshi Shiozaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  A Pilot Study Evaluating the Effects of Magtrace® for Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients Regarding Care Process Optimization, Reimbursement, Surgical Time, and Patient Comfort Compared With Standard Technetium99.

Authors:  Sina Shams; Kai Lippold; Jens Uwe Blohmer; Robert Röhle; Friedrich Kühn; Maria Margarete Karsten
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Does fine-needle aspiration biopsy still have a place in the diagnosis of breast lesions?

Authors:  Marzanna Obrzut; Marian Cholewa; Jakub Baran; Agnieszka Obrzut-Palusińska; Ewa Kurczab
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2018-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.