Literature DB >> 1891483

Outcome criteria in antidepressant drug trials: self-rating versus observer-rating scales.

H J Möller1.   

Abstract

An overview of the literature and some findings of the author's own empirical studies lead to the general conclusion that observer rating should be chosen as the principle outcome criterion in antidepressant drug trials. In various situations, however, self-rating scales can provide additional important information for therapy evaluation. The cross-sectional confirmity of observer ratings and self ratings of depression varies to a greater or lesser extent, depending on various background variables. With respect to longitudinal observation the relationship is much closer. Sensitivity for change can be attested not only to observer ratings but also to self ratings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1891483     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1014442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacopsychiatry        ISSN: 0176-3679            Impact factor:   5.788


  3 in total

1.  Consistencies and discrepancies in self- and observer-rated anxiety scales. A comparison between the self- and observer-rated Marks-Sheehan scales.

Authors:  M Albus; W Maier; D Shera; P Bech
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Principle standards and problems regarding proof of efficacy in clinical psychopharmacology.

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Möller; Karl Broich
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Methodological aspects in the assessment of severity of depression by the Hamilton Depression Scale.

Authors:  H J Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.270

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.