Literature DB >> 19888620

Principle standards and problems regarding proof of efficacy in clinical psychopharmacology.

Hans-Jürgen Möller1, Karl Broich.   

Abstract

Proof of efficacy of a psychotropic medicinal product is the key point of clinical psychopharmacology. This especially concerns the licensing of a new compound, but apart from this special case, lots of efficacy questions need to be answered in clinical psychopharmacology, such as, e.g. the question of the efficacy of a combination therapy. The methodology of the scientific proof of efficacy has already had a long tradition and has been developed further in the recent past under different aspects. Especially the double-blind randomised parallel group comparison has been developed as a design of highest methodological standard. However, often designs have their place and justification under certain conditions and in relation to certain questions. Although in the recent past, with the over-emphasis of so-called effectiveness studies, the inherent methodological limitations of these studies have not been addressed properly (Möller in Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 258:257-270, 2008), which in consequence devaluated the scientific merits of the classical double-blind randomised control group study designs in the view of those colleagues, who are not that experienced in study design issues. Therefore, it seems to be timely and necessary to review the principle standards and problems concerning the proof of efficacy in clinical psychopharmacology.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19888620     DOI: 10.1007/s00406-009-0071-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0940-1334            Impact factor:   5.270


  51 in total

Review 1.  Methodological issues in psychiatry: psychiatry as an empirical science.

Authors:  H J Möller
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Why olanzapine beats risperidone, risperidone beats quetiapine, and quetiapine beats olanzapine: an exploratory analysis of head-to-head comparison studies of second-generation antipsychotics.

Authors:  Stephan Heres; John Davis; Katja Maino; Elisabeth Jetzinger; Werner Kissling; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 3.  The nature and power of the placebo effect.

Authors:  Franklin G Miller; Donald L Rosenstein
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Phase IV research and drug utilization observation studies.

Authors:  M Linden
Journal:  Pharmacopsychiatry       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.788

5.  Guidelines for clinical trials of psychotropic drugs June 1, 1977.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol       Date:  1977-07

6.  Do efficacy and effectiveness samples differ in antidepressant treatment outcome? An analysis of eligibility criteria in randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Florian Seemüller; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Michael Obermeier; Mazda Adli; Michael Bauer; Klaus Kronmüller; Florian Holsboer; Peter Brieger; Gerd Laux; Wolfram Bender; Isabella Heuser; Joachim Zeiler; Wolfgang Gaebel; Rebecca Schennach-Wolff; Verena Henkel; Michael Riedel
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 4.384

7.  Symptomatic remission in previously untreated patients with schizophrenia: 2-year results from the SOHO study.

Authors:  Diego Novick; Josep Maria Haro; David Suarez; Martin Lambert; Jean-Pierre Lépine; Dieter Naber
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Symptom reduction and suicide risk in patients treated with placebo in antidepressant clinical trials: an analysis of the Food and Drug Administration database.

Authors:  A Khan; H A Warner; W A Brown
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-04

9.  Clinical investigations into antidepressive mechanisms. I. Antihistaminic and cholinolytic effects: amitriptyline versus promethazine.

Authors:  H Beckmann; M Schmauss
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1983

Review 10.  How effective are second-generation antipsychotic drugs? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  S Leucht; D Arbter; R R Engel; W Kissling; J M Davis
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 15.992

View more
  9 in total

1.  How close is evidence to truth in evidence-based treatment of mental disorders?

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Standardized diagnostic interviews, criteria, and algorithms for mental disorders: garbage in, garbage out.

Authors:  Michael Linden; Beate Muschalla
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Ethics of clinical research with mentally ill persons.

Authors:  Hanfried Helmchen
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  General and comparative efficacy and effectiveness of antidepressants in the acute treatment of depressive disorders: a report by the WPA section of pharmacopsychiatry.

Authors:  Thomas C Baghai; Pierre Blier; David S Baldwin; Michael Bauer; Guy M Goodwin; Kostas N Fountoulakis; Siegfried Kasper; Brian E Leonard; Ulrik F Malt; Dan Stein; Marcio Versiani; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  Validity of the definite and semidefinite questionnaire version of the Hamilton Depression Scale, the Hamilton Subscale and the Melancholia Scale. Part I.

Authors:  Jesper Bent-Hansen; Per Bech
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 5.270

6.  Critical trial-related criteria in acute schizophrenia studies.

Authors:  Michael Riedel; Stefan Leucht; Eckart Rüther; Max Schmauß; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 7.  Effectiveness studies: advantages and disadvantages.

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 5.986

8.  A novel human laboratory model for screening medications for alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Diana Ho; Brandon Towns; Erica N Grodin; Lara A Ray
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Brief examination of psychopharmacology.

Authors:  Abimbola Farinde
Journal:  J Basic Clin Pharm       Date:  2013-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.