Literature DB >> 1891215

Effect of cataract on automated perimetry.

B L Lam1, W L Alward, H E Kolder.   

Abstract

Humphrey visual fields (30-2 program) were performed on 24 otherwise healthy patients before and after cataract extraction to examine the effect of cataract on automated visual fields. All patients met reliability index criteria and recovered visual acuity of 20/25 or better. The effect of learning associated with repeated testing was controlled with visual fields of the fellow eye. Although a greater absolute threshold recovery occurred in the central region of the visual field after cataract extraction, the percent of threshold recovery did not vary across the visual field except for the most peripheral testing points, which demonstrated less recovery. Thus, cataracts depress an automated visual field fairly uniformly. Clinical grading of cataracts by a single experienced clinician was generally a poor predictor of visual field loss. Only the presence of posterior subcapsular plaque in the visual axis and the preoperative visual acuity correlated significantly with postoperative central threshold recovery. Pattern standard deviation remained unchanged after cataract removal, confirming it as a useful way of estimating visual loss from cataracts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1891215     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32175-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  22 in total

1.  Unilateral nasal hemianopsia secondary to posterior subcapsular cataract.

Authors:  I Rahman; A Nambiar; A F Spencer
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  How should we manage an amblyopic patient with cataract?

Authors:  J E Hale; S Murjaneh; N A Frost; R A Harrad
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  M A R Siddiqui; A Azuara-Blanco; S Neville
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Interpreting the multifocal visual evoked potential: the effects of refractive errors, cataracts, and fixation errors.

Authors:  B J Winn; E Shin; J G Odel; V C Greenstein; D C Hood
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 5.  Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.

Authors:  Rongrong Hu; Lyne Racette; Kelly S Chen; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Glaucoma surgery with or without adjunctive antiproliferatives in normal tension glaucoma: 2 Visual field progression.

Authors:  W L Membrey; C Bunce; D P Poinoosawmy; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Glaucoma Progression Analysis software compared with expert consensus opinion in the detection of visual field progression in glaucoma.

Authors:  Angelo P Tanna; Donald L Budenz; Jagadeesh Bandi; William J Feuer; Robert M Feldman; Leon W Herndon; Douglas J Rhee; Julia Whiteside-de Vos; Joyce Huang; Douglas R Anderson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Evaluation of the relationship between quality of vision and the visual function index in Japanese glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Hideko Sawada; Takeo Fukuchi; Haruki Abe
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Changes of visual-field global indices after cataract surgery in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Bo Ram Seol; Jin Wook Jeoung; Ki Ho Park
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Sources of binocular suprathreshold visual field loss in a cohort of older women being followed for risk of falls (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Anne Louise Coleman
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.