Literature DB >> 1887028

Air enema for diagnosis and reduction of intussusception: clinical experience and pressure correlates.

W E Shiels1, C K Maves, G L Hedlund, D R Kirks.   

Abstract

Air enema was used for exclusion, diagnosis, initial movement, and complete reduction of intussusception in 186 pediatric patients. Average pressure needed for initial movement of intussusception was 56.5 mm Hg; average maximum pressure of 97.8 mm Hg was required for complete reduction. Average fluoroscopy time required for intussusception reduction was 94.8 seconds; an average of 41.8 seconds was required to exclude intussusception. Intussusception was diagnosed in 75 patients, and reduction was accomplished in 65 (87%). Of 100 consecutive patients that underwent hydrostatic reduction of intussusception at the authors' institution, reduction was successful in 55. Compared with hydrostatic enema, air enema involves shorter fluoroscopy time and lower radiation dose to the patient. Air enema is safe and effective for diagnosis and treatment of intussusception in infants and children and has replaced hydrostatic enema for such procedures at the authors' institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1887028     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.181.1.1887028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  26 in total

Review 1.  Intussusception in children: evidence-based diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-04

2.  Therapeutic enema for pediatric ileocolic intussusception: using a balloon catheter improves efficacy.

Authors:  Bradford W Betz; Jeffrey E Hagedorn; Jeffrey S Guikema; Courtney L Barnes
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-06-09

3.  Why I still use barium for intussusception.

Authors:  A K Poznanski
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1995

4.  Pediatric radiology fellows' experience with intussusception reduction.

Authors:  Rebecca Stein-Wexler; Cyrus Bateni; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges; Chin-Shang Li
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-05-13

5.  Current methods for reducing intussusception: survey results.

Authors:  Rebecca Stein-Wexler; Rachel O'Connor; Heike Daldrup-Link; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-11-29

6.  Perforation during attempted intussusception reduction in children--a comparison of perforation with barium and air.

Authors:  A Daneman; D J Alton; S Ein; D Wesson; R Superina; P Thorner
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1995

7.  Pneumatic reduction of intussusception using carbon dioxide.

Authors:  C A Paterson; J C Langer; S Somers; G Stevenson; F P McGrath; D Malone; A L Winthrop; G Y Lau
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1994

Review 8.  Air intussusception reduction: "the winds of change".

Authors:  D R Kirks
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1995

9.  An interactive teaching device simulating intussusception reduction.

Authors:  Rebecca Stein-Wexler; Thomas Sanchez; Glade E Roper; Anthony S Wexler; Robert P Arieli; Clark Ho; Joseph C Li; Alp Ozpinar; Steffan K Soosman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-07-21

10.  An air insufflation device for reduction of intussusception in children.

Authors:  Reju J Thomas; Syam Rakhesh
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2008-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.