Literature DB >> 18853398

Variation in protein C(alpha)-related one-bond J couplings.

Jürgen M Schmidt1, Mark J Howard, Mitcheell Maestre-Martínez, Carlos S Pérez, Frank Löhr.   

Abstract

Four types of polypeptide (1)J(C alpha X) couplings are examined, involving the main-chain carbon C(alpha) and either of four possible substituents. A total 3105 values of (1)J(C alpha H alpha), (1)J(C alpha C beta), (1)J(C alpha C'), and (1)J(C alpha N') were collected from six proteins, averaging 143.4 +/- 3.3, 34.9 +/- 2.5, 52.6 +/- 0.9, and 10.7 +/- 1.2 Hz, respectively. Analysis of variances (ANOVA) reveals a variety of factors impacting on (1)J and ranks their relative statistical significance and importance to biomolecular NMR structure refinement. Accordingly, the spread in the (1)J values is attributed, in equal proportions, to amino-acid specific substituent patterns and to polypeptide-chain geometry, specifically torsions phi, psi, and chi(1) circumjacent to C(alpha). The (1)J coupling constants correlate with protein secondary structure. For alpha-helical phi, psi combinations, (1)J(C alpha H alpha) is elevated by more than one standard deviation (147.8 Hz), while both (1)J(C alpha N') and (1)J(C alpha C beta) fall short of their grand means (9.5 and 33.7 Hz). Rare positive phi torsion angles in proteins exhibit concomitant small (1)J(C alpha H alpha) and (1)J(C alpha N') (138.4 and 9.6 Hz) and large (1)J(C alpha C beta) (39.9 Hz) values. The (1)J(C alpha N') coupling varies monotonously over the phi torsion range typical of beta-sheet secondary structure and is largest (13.3 Hz) for phi around -160 degrees. All four coupling types depend on psi and thus help determine a torsion that is notoriously difficult to assess by traditional approaches using (3)J. Influences on (1)J stemming from protein secondary structure and other factors, such as amino-acid composition, are largely independent. 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18853398     DOI: 10.1002/mrc.2337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Chem        ISSN: 0749-1581            Impact factor:   2.447


  7 in total

1.  Improved validation of IDP ensembles by one-bond Cα-Hα scalar couplings.

Authors:  Vytautas Gapsys; Raghavendran L Narayanan; ShengQi Xiang; Bert L de Groot; Markus Zweckstetter
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Improved accuracy in measuring one-bond and two-bond (15)N, (13)C (α) coupling constants in proteins by double-inphase/antiphase (DIPAP) spectroscopy.

Authors:  Frank Löhr; Sina Reckel; Susanne Stefer; Volker Dötsch; Jürgen M Schmidt
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Assessing the One-Bond Cα-H Spin-Spin Coupling Constants in Proteins: Pros and Cons of Different Approaches.

Authors:  Agustina Arroyuelo; Osvaldo A Martin; Harold A Scheraga; Jorge A Vila
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  A J-modulated protonless NMR experiment characterizes the conformational ensemble of the intrinsically disordered protein WIP.

Authors:  Eva Rozentur-Shkop; Gil Goobes; Jordan H Chill
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Time-shared experiments for efficient assignment of triple-selectively labeled proteins.

Authors:  Frank Löhr; Aisha Laguerre; Christoph Bock; Sina Reckel; Peter J Connolly; Norzehan Abdul-Manan; Franz Tumulka; Rupert Abele; Jonathan M Moore; Volker Dötsch
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Quantitative evaluation of positive ϕ angle propensity in flexible regions of proteins from three-bond J couplings.

Authors:  Jung Ho Lee; Jinfa Ying; Ad Bax
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 7.  13C Direct Detected NMR for Challenging Systems.

Authors:  Isabella C Felli; Roberta Pierattelli
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 72.087

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.