Literature DB >> 18853364

Trees of trees: an approach to comparing multiple alternative phylogenies.

Tom M W Nye1.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic analysis very commonly produces several alternative trees for a given fixed set of taxa. For example, different sets of orthologous genes may be analyzed, or the analysis may sample from a distribution of probable trees. This article describes an approach to comparing and visualizing multiple alternative phylogenies via the idea of a "tree of trees" or "meta-tree." A meta-tree clusters phylogenies with similar topologies together in the same way that a phylogeny clusters species with similar DNA sequences. Leaf nodes on a meta-tree correspond to the original set of phylogenies given by some analysis, whereas interior nodes correspond to certain consensus topologies. The construction of meta-trees is motivated by analogy with construction of a most parsimonious tree for DNA data, but instead of using DNA letters, in a meta-tree the characters are partitions or splits of the set of taxa. An efficient algorithm for meta-tree construction is described that makes use of a known relationship between the majority consensus and parsimony in terms of gain and loss of splits. To illustrate these ideas meta-trees are constructed for two datasets: a set of gene trees for species of yeast and trees from a bootstrap analysis of a set of gene trees in ray-finned fish. A software tool for constructing meta-trees and comparing alternative phylogenies is available online, and the source code can be obtained from the author.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18853364     DOI: 10.1080/10635150802424072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  13 in total

1.  Categorizing ideas about trees: a tree of trees.

Authors:  Marie Fisler; Guillaume Lecointre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  kdetrees: Non-parametric estimation of phylogenetic tree distributions.

Authors:  Grady Weyenberg; Peter M Huggins; Christopher L Schardl; Daniel K Howe; Ruriko Yoshida
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Stability of SARS-CoV-2 phylogenies.

Authors:  Yatish Turakhia; Nicola De Maio; Bryan Thornlow; Landen Gozashti; Robert Lanfear; Conor R Walker; Angie S Hinrichs; Jason D Fernandes; Rui Borges; Greg Slodkowicz; Lukas Weilguny; David Haussler; Nick Goldman; Russell Corbett-Detig
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Signal processing for metagenomics: extracting information from the soup.

Authors:  Gail L Rosen; Bahrad A Sokhansanj; Robi Polikar; Mary Ann Bruns; Jacob Russell; Elaine Garbarine; Steve Essinger; Non Yok
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.236

5.  An intuitive, informative, and most balanced representation of phylogenetic topologies.

Authors:  Wataru Iwasaki; Toshihisa Takagi
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Feedstocks affect the diversity and distribution of propionate CoA-transferase genes (pct) in anaerobic digesters.

Authors:  Yueh-Fen Li; Shan Wei; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  On Defining and Finding Islands of Trees and Mitigating Large Island Bias.

Authors:  Ana Serra Silva; Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 8.  Evaluating phylogenetic congruence in the post-genomic era.

Authors:  Jessica W Leigh; François-Joseph Lapointe; Philippe Lopez; Eric Bapteste
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Molecular vibration-activity relationship in the agonism of adenosine receptors.

Authors:  Hyun Keun Chee; S June Oh
Journal:  Genomics Inform       Date:  2013-12-31

10.  Genetic species identification and population structure of Halophila (Hydrocharitaceae) from the Western Pacific to the Eastern Indian Ocean.

Authors:  Vy X Nguyen; Matsapume Detcharoen; Piyalap Tuntiprapas; U Soe-Htun; Japar B Sidik; Muta Z Harah; Anchana Prathep; Jutta Papenbrock
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.