PURPOSE: To investigate the differential proteins and related molecular mechanism of CDA-II (cell differentiation agent-II) induced therapy on a human hepatocellular carcinoma model in nude mice with high metastatic potential (LCI-D20). METHODS: After tumors were transplanted 11 days, mice were intraperitoneally injected with CDA-II (1,800 mg/kg) for 20 days continuously. The tumor growth-inhibitory efficiency in CDA-II treated groups was calculated. Proteins extracted from tumor tissue were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) and the differential proteins were identified by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Western blotting (WB) was performed to verify the expression of certain candidate proteins. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was engaged to study the molecular mechanism of the therapy. RESULTS: CDA-II suppressed the growth and metastasis of tumor. The tumor growth-inhibitory efficiency was 41.8%. In total, 27 differentially expressed proteins were identified, including HSP27, UGDH, CK8, Hsp60, ENOA and AnxA5, with functions involved in oncogene expression and/or cell differentiation. In addition, apparent alternations of HSP60 and beta-actin expression levels and their different posttranslational modifications (PTMs) were investigated. RT-PCR analysis confirmed that the cancer related genes c-myc, N-ras and MMP-9 were significantly down-regulated. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that CDA-II presence can change the proteome profiling and favors of the tumor suppression in LCI-D20 cell differentiation. Our results also suggest that the dynamic PTM of HSP60 expression levels could be used to predict HCC and might be a promising and useful biomarker to prognosticate CDA-II therapeutic efficacy.
PURPOSE: To investigate the differential proteins and related molecular mechanism of CDA-II (cell differentiation agent-II) induced therapy on a humanhepatocellular carcinoma model in nude mice with high metastatic potential (LCI-D20). METHODS: After tumors were transplanted 11 days, mice were intraperitoneally injected with CDA-II (1,800 mg/kg) for 20 days continuously. The tumor growth-inhibitory efficiency in CDA-II treated groups was calculated. Proteins extracted from tumor tissue were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) and the differential proteins were identified by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Western blotting (WB) was performed to verify the expression of certain candidate proteins. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was engaged to study the molecular mechanism of the therapy. RESULTS:CDA-II suppressed the growth and metastasis of tumor. The tumor growth-inhibitory efficiency was 41.8%. In total, 27 differentially expressed proteins were identified, including HSP27, UGDH, CK8, Hsp60, ENOA and AnxA5, with functions involved in oncogene expression and/or cell differentiation. In addition, apparent alternations of HSP60 and beta-actin expression levels and their different posttranslational modifications (PTMs) were investigated. RT-PCR analysis confirmed that the cancer related genes c-myc, N-ras and MMP-9 were significantly down-regulated. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that CDA-II presence can change the proteome profiling and favors of the tumor suppression in LCI-D20 cell differentiation. Our results also suggest that the dynamic PTM of HSP60 expression levels could be used to predict HCC and might be a promising and useful biomarker to prognosticate CDA-II therapeutic efficacy.
Authors: Francesco Cappello; Antonino Di Stefano; Silvestro E D'Anna; Claudio F Donner; Giovanni Zummo Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Francesco Cappello; Antonino Di Stefano; Sabrina David; Francesco Rappa; Rita Anzalone; Giampiero La Rocca; Silvestro E D'Anna; Francesca Magno; Claudio F Donner; Bruno Balbi; Giovanni Zummo Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: E Mata-Greenwood; A Ito; H Westenburg; B Cui; R G Mehta; A D Kinghorn; J M Pezzuto Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2001 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Katarina Ejeskär; Cecilia Krona; Helena Carén; Faten Zaibak; Lingli Li; Tommy Martinsson; Panayiotis A Ioannou Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2005-12-16 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Olena Masui; Nicole M A White; Leroi V DeSouza; Olga Krakovska; Ajay Matta; Shereen Metias; Bishoy Khalil; Alexander D Romaschin; R John Honey; Robert Stewart; Kenneth Pace; Georg A Bjarnason; K W Michael Siu; George M Yousef Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Carmen Herencia; Julio M Martínez-Moreno; Concepción Herrera; Fernando Corrales; Raquel Santiago-Mora; Isabel Espejo; Monserrat Barco; Yolanda Almadén; Manuel de la Mata; Antonio Rodríguez-Ariza; Juan R Muñoz-Castañeda Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-10 Impact factor: 3.240