BACKGROUND: Determination of prognosis in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is desirable in order to improve case selection for surgery and tailor adjuvant treatment according to individual recurrence risk. Conventional clinicopathological factors lack the sensitivity to accurately achieve this goal. Consideration of tumour biology and the identification of molecular prognostic markers may allow more accurate risk stratification. METHOD: This systematic review examines evidence from published manuscripts looking at molecular markers in resectable colorectal liver metastases and their correlation with disease recurrence and survival following hepatectomy. RESULTS: Studies have yielded promising results in the search for prognostic molecular markers of CLM. Molecular biomarkers from varied aspects of tumour biology have been examined and a number of these, including proliferation indices, telomerase, thymidylate synthase, microvessel density and thrombospondin-1 appear to have prognostic utility in this context. Validation of other markers, notably p53, has been limited by a failure of methodologies to account for their biological complexity. CONCLUSIONS: A biomarker-based approach may yield significant benefits through informed treatment of resectable metastatic colorectal malignancy. Standardised retrospective analyses are necessary to confirm preliminary findings and identify existing and novel markers for inclusion into prospective studies. Assessment and verification of multiple molecular markers in this manner may allow molecular profiling of metastases and tailoring of therapy according to the biological aggressiveness of individual tumours. The advent of genomic- and proteomic-based technologies will allow the simultaneous analysis of multiple molecular markers and the derivation of disease profiles associated with disease recurrence and poor survival.
BACKGROUND: Determination of prognosis in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is desirable in order to improve case selection for surgery and tailor adjuvant treatment according to individual recurrence risk. Conventional clinicopathological factors lack the sensitivity to accurately achieve this goal. Consideration of tumour biology and the identification of molecular prognostic markers may allow more accurate risk stratification. METHOD: This systematic review examines evidence from published manuscripts looking at molecular markers in resectable colorectal liver metastases and their correlation with disease recurrence and survival following hepatectomy. RESULTS: Studies have yielded promising results in the search for prognostic molecular markers of CLM. Molecular biomarkers from varied aspects of tumour biology have been examined and a number of these, including proliferation indices, telomerase, thymidylate synthase, microvessel density and thrombospondin-1 appear to have prognostic utility in this context. Validation of other markers, notably p53, has been limited by a failure of methodologies to account for their biological complexity. CONCLUSIONS: A biomarker-based approach may yield significant benefits through informed treatment of resectable metastatic colorectal malignancy. Standardised retrospective analyses are necessary to confirm preliminary findings and identify existing and novel markers for inclusion into prospective studies. Assessment and verification of multiple molecular markers in this manner may allow molecular profiling of metastases and tailoring of therapy according to the biological aggressiveness of individual tumours. The advent of genomic- and proteomic-based technologies will allow the simultaneous analysis of multiple molecular markers and the derivation of disease profiles associated with disease recurrence and poor survival.
Authors: Kyriakos Neofytou; Elizabeth C Smyth; Alexandros Giakoustidis; Aamir Z Khan; David Cunningham; Satvinder Mudan Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2014-09-14 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: D J Watkins; I Chau; D Cunningham; S S Mudan; N Karanjia; G Brown; S Ashley; A R Norman; A Gillbanks Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 7.640