Cristine D Delnevo1, Ursula E Bauer. 1. UMDNJ-School of Public Health, 335 George Street, Suite 2100, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This Host paper (III of V) reviews key surveillance and evaluation systems that monitor the characteristics, attitudes and behaviors of tobacco users that are crucial for tobacco control efforts. METHODS: We summarize and expand on the recommendations from the Host Working Group of the National Tobacco Monitoring, Research and Evaluation Workshop. We also discuss research challenges and make additional recommendations for improving tobacco control surveillance and evaluation. RESULTS: We reviewed 10 major US surveys that collect data on tobacco use. A great deal of data is collected but gaps exist. Data collection on cigars, smokeless tobacco, brand, menthols, and PREPs is sparse and infrequent. Also, a number of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in US population composition, declines in survey response rates, and increases in cell phone use present research challenges that may impact the ongoing utility of these systems. CONCLUSIONS: Although the field of tobacco control research is an advanced area of public health, improvements in data systems are necessary to accurately evaluate progress and continue tobacco control gains. A coordinated surveillance and evaluation network would increase efficiency and improve the overall utility, quality and timeliness of the current data systems.
OBJECTIVE: This Host paper (III of V) reviews key surveillance and evaluation systems that monitor the characteristics, attitudes and behaviors of tobacco users that are crucial for tobacco control efforts. METHODS: We summarize and expand on the recommendations from the Host Working Group of the National Tobacco Monitoring, Research and Evaluation Workshop. We also discuss research challenges and make additional recommendations for improving tobacco control surveillance and evaluation. RESULTS: We reviewed 10 major US surveys that collect data on tobacco use. A great deal of data is collected but gaps exist. Data collection on cigars, smokeless tobacco, brand, menthols, and PREPs is sparse and infrequent. Also, a number of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in US population composition, declines in survey response rates, and increases in cell phone use present research challenges that may impact the ongoing utility of these systems. CONCLUSIONS: Although the field of tobacco control research is an advanced area of public health, improvements in data systems are necessary to accurately evaluate progress and continue tobacco control gains. A coordinated surveillance and evaluation network would increase efficiency and improve the overall utility, quality and timeliness of the current data systems.
Authors: Jill M Williams; Mia Hanos Zimmermann; Marc L Steinberg; Kunal K Gandhi; Cris Delnevo; Michael B Steinberg; Jonathan Foulds Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2011-09
Authors: Daniel A Gundersen; Randal S ZuWallack; James Dayton; Sandra E Echeverría; Cristine D Delnevo Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: David A Siegel; S Jane Henley; Jennifer M Wike; A Blythe Ryerson; Christopher J Johnson; Judy R Rees; Lori A Pollack Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly; Kaila J Norton; David Sweanor; Mark Parascandola; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Janet Brigham; Christina N Lessov-Schlaggar; Harold S Javitz; Ruth E Krasnow; Elizabeth Tildesley; Judy Andrews; Hyman Hops; Marie D Cornelius; Nancy L Day; Mary McElroy; Gary E Swan Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-08-18 Impact factor: 4.897