Gary A Giovino1, Jessica A Kulak, William D Kalsbeek, Scott J Leischow. 1. Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA. ggiovino@buffalo.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Articles 20, 21, and 22 call for strong monitoring and reporting of tobacco use and factors influencing use and disease (Articles 20 and 21) and for collaboration among the Parties and relevant organizations to share resources, knowledge, and expertise on all relevant tobacco control strategies (Article 22). METHODS: This paper provides background information and discusses research strategies that would strengthen these efforts and better inform the parties. By necessity, Articles 20 and 21 are discussed separately from Article 22, although 1 example that relates to both 20/21 and 22 is discussed at the end. RESULTS: Twelve important research opportunities on surveillance and evaluation are recognized, along with 4 on collaboration. The authors believe that the 6 most important areas for research would study (a) possible underreporting of tobacco use among certain demographic groups in some countries, (b) measures of industry activities, (c) optimal sampling strategies, (d) sentinel surveillance, (e) networks of tobacco companies and their partners as they promote tobacco use and interfere with implementation of the FCTC, and (f) network/relationship factors that impact diffusion of knowledge and decision making on the implementation of the FCTC. In addition, we call for a review process of existing surveillance and evaluation strategies to coordinate activities to make optimal use of existing resources. This activity would involve networking as prescribed in Article 22. CONCLUSIONS: Studies and activities such as these would facilitate control of the tobacco epidemic.
INTRODUCTION: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Articles 20, 21, and 22 call for strong monitoring and reporting of tobacco use and factors influencing use and disease (Articles 20 and 21) and for collaboration among the Parties and relevant organizations to share resources, knowledge, and expertise on all relevant tobacco control strategies (Article 22). METHODS: This paper provides background information and discusses research strategies that would strengthen these efforts and better inform the parties. By necessity, Articles 20 and 21 are discussed separately from Article 22, although 1 example that relates to both 20/21 and 22 is discussed at the end. RESULTS: Twelve important research opportunities on surveillance and evaluation are recognized, along with 4 on collaboration. The authors believe that the 6 most important areas for research would study (a) possible underreporting of tobacco use among certain demographic groups in some countries, (b) measures of industry activities, (c) optimal sampling strategies, (d) sentinel surveillance, (e) networks of tobacco companies and their partners as they promote tobacco use and interfere with implementation of the FCTC, and (f) network/relationship factors that impact diffusion of knowledge and decision making on the implementation of the FCTC. In addition, we call for a review process of existing surveillance and evaluation strategies to coordinate activities to make optimal use of existing resources. This activity would involve networking as prescribed in Article 22. CONCLUSIONS: Studies and activities such as these would facilitate control of the tobacco epidemic.
Authors: Amanda Baker; Rowena G Ivers; Jenny Bowman; Tony Butler; Frances J Kay-Lambkin; Paula Wye; Raoul A Walsh; Lisa Jackson Pulver; Robyn Richmond; Josephine Belcher; Kay Wilhelm; Alex Wodak Journal: Drug Alcohol Rev Date: 2006-01
Authors: Gary A Giovino; Lois Biener; Anne M Hartman; Stephen E Marcus; Michael W Schooley; Terry F Pechacek; Donna Vallone Journal: Prev Med Date: 2008-09-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Janet Brigham; Christina N Lessov-Schlaggar; Harold S Javitz; Mary McElroy; Ruth Krasnow; Gary E Swan Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Gary A Giovino; Sara A Mirza; Jonathan M Samet; Prakash C Gupta; Martin J Jarvis; Neeraj Bhala; Richard Peto; Witold Zatonski; Jason Hsia; Jeremy Morton; Krishna M Palipudi; Samira Asma Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-08-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Scott J Leischow; Janet Okamoto; Scott McIntosh; Deborah J Ossip; Harry A Lando Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 3.295