Literature DB >> 18851892

The contribution of occupational factors to social inequalities in health: findings from the national French SUMER survey.

Isabelle Niedhammer1, Jean-François Chastang, Simone David, Cecily Kelleher.   

Abstract

Social inequalities in health have long been demonstrated, but the understanding of these inequalities remains unclear. Work and its related occupational factors may contribute to these inequalities. The objective of this study was to study the contribution of work factors using an integrated approach (including all types of exposures) to social inequalities in three health outcomes: poor self-reported health, long sickness absence, and work injury. Respondents were 14,241 men and 10,245 women drawn from a survey of the national French working population (response rate: 96.5%). Work factors included job characteristics, and occupational exposures of the physical, ergonomic, biological, chemical, and psychosocial work environment. All work factors were measured through expert evaluation by occupational physicians, except psychosocial work factors, which were self-reported. Strong social gradients were found for all work factors, except for psychological demands, workplace bullying, and aggression from the public. Marked social gradients were also observed for the health outcomes studied, blue collar workers being more likely to report poor self-reported health, long sickness absence, and work injury. The social differences in health were reduced strongly after adjustment for work factors (psychological demands excluded) by 24-58% according to sex and health outcomes. The strongest impacts were found for decision latitude, ergonomic, physical, and chemical exposures, as well as for work schedules. A detailed analysis allowed us to identify more precisely the contributing occupational factors. It suggests that concerted prevention of occupational risk factors would be useful not only to improve health at work, but also to reduce social inequalities in health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18851892     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  50 in total

1.  Can a single-item measure assess physical load at work? An analysis from the GAZEL cohort.

Authors:  Erika L Sabbath; Marcel Goldberg; Qiong Wu; Alexis Descatha
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Response to the letter to the editor by Latza et al.: Indirect evaluation of attributable fractions for psychosocial work exposures: a difficult research area.

Authors:  Isabelle Niedhammer; Hélène Sultan-Taïeb; Jean-François Chastang; Greet Vermeylen; Agnès Parent-Thirion
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Socioeconomic position and low-back pain--the role of biomechanical strains and psychosocial work factors in the GAZEL cohort.

Authors:  Sandrine Plouvier; Annette Leclerc; Jean-François Chastang; Sébastien Bonenfant; Marcel Goldberg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Fractions of cardiovascular diseases and mental disorders attributable to psychosocial work factors in 31 countries in Europe.

Authors:  Isabelle Niedhammer; Hélène Sultan-Taïeb; Jean-François Chastang; Greet Vermeylen; Agnès Parent-Thirion
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Study of the validity of a job-exposure matrix for the job strain model factors: an update and a study of changes over time.

Authors:  Isabelle Niedhammer; Allison Milner; Anthony D LaMontagne; Jean-François Chastang
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Blue-collar work and women's health: A systematic review of the evidence from 1990 to 2015.

Authors:  Holly Elser; April M Falconi; Michelle Bass; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2018-08-18

7.  Varied exposure to carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic (CMR) chemicals in occupational settings in France.

Authors:  Nathalie Havet; Alexis Penot; Magali Morelle; Lionel Perrier; Barbara Charbotel; Béatrice Fervers
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Contribution of material, occupational, and psychosocial factors in the explanation of social inequalities in health in 28 countries in Europe.

Authors:  B Aldabe; R Anderson; M Lyly-Yrjänäinen; A Parent-Thirion; G Vermeylen; C C Kelleher; I Niedhammer
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Working conditions and depressive symptoms in the 2003 decennial health survey: the role of the occupational category.

Authors:  Christine Cohidon; Gaëlle Santin; Ellen Imbernon; Marcel Goldberg
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 10.  Discrimination, harassment, abuse, and bullying in the workplace: contribution of workplace injustice to occupational health disparities.

Authors:  Cassandra A Okechukwu; Kerry Souza; Kelly D Davis; A Butch de Castro
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.