Literature DB >> 18849510

"I'm not a saint": burden assessment as an unrecognized factor in prenatal decision making.

Judith L M McCoyd1.   

Abstract

Prenatal testing is widely utilized, yet few studies have explored decision-making processes about diagnosis from the pregnant woman's standpoint. This qualitative, exploratory study reveals a factor not accounted for in prior research geared toward associations between demographic categories and decisions. The 30 women in this study demonstrated a three-part decisional trajectory that included an effort to collect information about the challenges a potential child with their particular diagnosis might experience. They then assessed their social context, familial supports, and resilience as a couple. A final yet crucial step was an assessment of the woman's own capacity to provide this level of care within her unique context. Few genetics teams have a member with biopsychosocial expertise and time who can help the woman/couple reflect on the situated context of the decision and its impact. Better care strategies to support women and couples through this experience are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18849510     DOI: 10.1177/1049732308325642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  6 in total

1.  Authoritative knowledge, the technological imperative and women's responses to prenatal diagnostic technologies.

Authors:  Judith L M McCoyd
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2010-12

Review 2.  Balancing Genetics (Science) and Counseling (Art) in Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Testing.

Authors:  Allison Werner-Lin; Judith L M McCoyd; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  "Something Extra on Chromosome 5": Parents' Understanding of Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) Results.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Allison Werner-Lin; Amita Russell; Ronald J Wapner; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.

Authors:  Marsha Michie
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  The decision: Relations to oneself, authority and vulnerability in the field of selective abortion.

Authors:  Sølvi Marie Risøy; Thorvald Sirnes
Journal:  Biosocieties       Date:  2015-09

6.  Accuracy of in-utero MRI to detect fetal brain abnormalities and prognosticate developmental outcome: postnatal follow-up of the MERIDIAN cohort.

Authors:  Anthony R Hart; Nicholas D Embleton; Michael Bradburn; Daniel J A Connolly; Laura Mandefield; Cara Mooney; Paul D Griffiths
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-11-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.