Literature DB >> 18849385

Producing and using genetic evaluations in the United States beef industry of today.

D J Garrick1, B L Golden.   

Abstract

The overall motivation for the development of an information system for beef cattle improvement is the belief that knowledge of breeding values and heterosis effects allows one to determine the consequences of alternative selection and mating options. With this information, livestock managers can easily shift populations in a desirable direction. The foundation principles for establishing a sound breeding program, including the prediction of animal performance for economically relevant traits and their incorporation into a single index of aggregate economic merit, have been well established over the last half century. Rather than this goal-based approach, the industry adopted a data-driven approach to the production of genetic evaluations that has been characterized by an overemphasis on the evaluation of productive traits, notably BW at various ages, with inadequate regard for other economically important traits, such as reproduction, animal health, and feed requirements. Production of evaluations is breed association centered, and this has delayed the introduction of national across-breed evaluations for all breeds and crosses of cattle. The computational aspects of producing evaluations are now migrating from land-grant universities to breed associations, but not yet to a single entity. The introduction of genomic information in the form of high-density SNP panels will introduce threats, challenges, and new opportunities for the production of evaluations, and represents the largest force to alter the structure of the beef improvement industry since the advent of AI. The use of evaluations has, until recently, stopped short of the provision of index merit as a basis for selection. Accordingly, the value propositions associated with annual improvement or the selection of alternative sires has not been well communicated. Technology, along with economic and other issues related to stakeholder acceptance, will collectively determine the future nature of the industry in terms of the production and use of evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18849385     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  Genetic trends for live weight traits reflect breeding strategies in registered Charolais Farms in Mexico.

Authors:  G M Parra-Bracamonte; N Lopez-Villalobos; S T Morris; A M Sifuentes-Rincón; L A Lopez-Bustamante
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 2.  The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States.

Authors:  Dorian J Garrick
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation.

Authors:  Mahdi Saatchi; Mathew C McClure; Stephanie D McKay; Megan M Rolf; JaeWoo Kim; Jared E Decker; Tasia M Taxis; Richard H Chapple; Holly R Ramey; Sally L Northcutt; Stewart Bauck; Brent Woodward; Jack C M Dekkers; Rohan L Fernando; Robert D Schnabel; Dorian J Garrick; Jeremy F Taylor
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Comparison of economic returns among genetic evaluation strategies in a 2-tiered Charolais-sired beef cattle production system.

Authors:  Justin W Buchanan; Michael D MacNeil; Randall C Raymond; Ashley R Nilles; Alison Louise Van Eenennaam
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Unintended consequences of selection for increased production on the health and welfare of livestock.

Authors:  Este van Marle-Köster; Carina Visser
Journal:  Arch Anim Breed       Date:  2021-05-25

6.  Accuracy of direct genomic breeding values for nationally evaluated traits in US Limousin and Simmental beef cattle.

Authors:  Mahdi Saatchi; Robert D Schnabel; Megan M Rolf; Jeremy F Taylor; Dorian J Garrick
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.