Literature DB >> 18849131

Evaluation and optimization of fMRI single-subject processing pipelines with NPAIRS and second-level CVA.

Jing Zhang1, Jon R Anderson, Lichen Liang, Sujit K Pulapura, Lael Gatewood, David A Rottenberg, Stephen C Strother.   

Abstract

In functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis, although the univariate general linear model (GLM) is currently the dominant approach to brain activation detection, there is growing interest in multivariate approaches such as principal component analysis, canonical variate analysis (CVA), independent component analysis and cluster analysis, which have the potential to reveal neural networks and functional connectivity in the brain. To understand the effect of processing options on performance of multivariate model-based fMRI processing pipelines with real fMRI data, we investigated the impact of commonly used fMRI preprocessing steps and optimized the associated multivariate CVA-based, single-subject processing pipelines with the NPAIRS (nonparametric prediction, activation, influence and reproducibility resampling) performance metrics [prediction accuracy and statistical parametric image (SPI) reproducibility] on the Fiswidgets platform. We also compared the single-subject SPIs of univariate GLM with multivariate CVA-based processing pipelines from SPM, FSL.FEAT, NPAIRS.GLM and NPAIRS.CVA software packages (or modules) using a novel second-level CVA. We found that for the block-design data, (a) slice timing correction and global intensity normalization have little consistent impact on the fMRI processing pipeline, but spatial smoothing, temporal detrending or high-pass filtering, and motion correction significantly improved pipeline performance across all subjects; (b) the combined optimization of spatial smoothing, temporal detrending and CVA model parameters on average improved between-subject reproducibility; and (c) the most important pipeline choices include univariate or multivariate statistical models and spatial smoothing. This study suggests that considering options other than simply using GLM with a fixed spatial filter may be of critical importance in determining activation patterns in BOLD fMRI studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18849131     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  13 in total

1.  A mutual information-based metric for evaluation of fMRI data-processing approaches.

Authors:  Babak Afshin-Pour; Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh; Gholam-Ali Hossein-Zadeh; Cheryl L Grady; Stephen C Strother
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Optimizing preprocessing and analysis pipelines for single-subject fMRI. I. Standard temporal motion and physiological noise correction methods.

Authors:  Nathan W Churchill; Anita Oder; Hervé Abdi; Fred Tam; Wayne Lee; Christopher Thomas; Jon E Ween; Simon J Graham; Stephen C Strother
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Comparing within-subject classification and regularization methods in fMRI for large and small sample sizes.

Authors:  Nathan W Churchill; Grigori Yourganov; Stephen C Strother
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Data-driven optimization and evaluation of 2D EPI and 3D PRESTO for BOLD fMRI at 7 Tesla: I. Focal coverage.

Authors:  Robert L Barry; Stephen C Strother; J Christopher Gatenby; John C Gore
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Complex and magnitude-only preprocessing of 2D and 3D BOLD fMRI data at 7 T.

Authors:  Robert L Barry; Stephen C Strother; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Altered brain activation during visuomotor integration in chronic active cannabis users: relationship to cortisol levels.

Authors:  George R King; Thomas Ernst; Weiran Deng; Andrew Stenger; Rachael M K Gonzales; Helenna Nakama; Linda Chang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Machine Learning in Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Miles N Wernick; Yongyi Yang; Jovan G Brankov; Grigori Yourganov; Stephen C Strother
Journal:  IEEE Signal Process Mag       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 12.551

8.  An improved framework for confound regression and filtering for control of motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional connectivity data.

Authors:  Theodore D Satterthwaite; Mark A Elliott; Raphael T Gerraty; Kosha Ruparel; James Loughead; Monica E Calkins; Simon B Eickhoff; Hakon Hakonarson; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Daniel H Wolf
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Optimizing preprocessing and analysis pipelines for single-subject fMRI: 2. Interactions with ICA, PCA, task contrast and inter-subject heterogeneity.

Authors:  Nathan W Churchill; Grigori Yourganov; Anita Oder; Fred Tam; Simon J Graham; Stephen C Strother
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  fMRI reliability: influences of task and experimental design.

Authors:  Craig M Bennett; Michael B Miller
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.